byf
New member
Are Scum...
That is all.
That is all.
Is that just a random rant or directed at something in particular ?The way they treat people.....invading their peace,lives and own privacy...giving people false hope...,shoving camera's in any one half famous and trying to humiliate them.
Goading people to actually come up with any dirt on anyone they can...caring not one little bit who they hurt and who they stamp on..just as long as they get their story.
Trying to ruin peoples careers..simply for a 2 page special that might sell an extra few papers...
Also the fact a family member of mine had a real rough time with a paper once....and it wasn't a nice exp...they print whatever you tell them...and it ain't on..
The way they treat people.....invading their peace,lives and own privacy...giving people false hope...,shoving camera's in any one half famous and trying to humiliate them.
Goading people to actually come up with any dirt on anyone they can...caring not one little bit who they hurt and who they stamp on..just aslong as they get their story.
Trying to ruin peoples careers..simply for a 2 page speacila that might sell an extra few papers...
Also the fact a family member of mine had a real rough time with a paper once....and it wasnt a nice exp...they print whateever you tell them...and it aint on..
mmmmmmmm I likes Hovis I doHovis is quite brown with lots of bits in though. And the crusts are quite chewy.
...they print whateever you tell them.....
Are Scum...
That is all.
I'm British and "media". Today I wrote a story about a doctor who's invented special ear implants to stop people with big ears looking silly.
I don't call that being scum. I call that serving the great British public.
I'm a photographer, and I have worked in the media.
I think (I hope) the original rant was aimed at the "paparazzi", who, on the whole, are scum.
There are however a lot of newspaper photographers that are certainly not scum.
They cover genuine news stories, sports and all the rest of the non "celebrity shite".
I'm a photographer, and I have worked in the media.
I think (I hope) the original rant was aimed at the "paparazzi", who, on the whole, are scum.
There are however a lot of newspaper photographers that are certainly not scum.
They cover genuine news stories, sports and all the rest of the non "celebrity shite".
Agreed the Paparazzi are scum but where does that leave the people who pay to see their efforts in the media ? If there wasn't a demand they wouldn't do it would they ?
We've got to know a few motorsports reporters and photographers and can wholehearted agree that they are definitely not scum, and are in fact great guys!
I had some rare dealings recently with motorsport journos and photographers, and they seemed a great bunch.
There seemed to much more of a sense of a community of people who just love the sport with the specialists in that branch of journalism, they aren't simply looking to stitch people up all the time like a few (and it is only a few) football journos - not embittered old hacks, but just genuine enthusiasts.
We've got to know a few motorsports reporters and photographers and can wholehearted agree that they are definitely not scum, and are in fact great guys!