surrey jim
Not in Surrey
I was quite happy with my 203 post count but I do think getting rid of them will give the small posters like myself a bigger voice.
sorry, cant hear you
I was quite happy with my 203 post count but I do think getting rid of them will give the small posters like myself a bigger voice.
Harmless bit of fun,so lets keep them.
The only people that give a f***ing shit about post counts are the ones that say, "your opinion does't count because your post count is under 3,000." Anyone who has that many posts is a complete sad twat or loner or in 1066 case both.[/QUOTE]
Or someone who ejoys playing word association
Or someone who ejoys playing word association
Too intelectual for me, expecially with this new 10 character minimum.
To be fair i had to get used to putting all the full stops at the end
That is about the only thing i get right on this board.
I fail to see what harm the post count was doing. I know some said it was used to bully or boast but I can't actually remember seeing any of that. And if anyone tried, would you actually take any notice of them? You'd have to be pretty sad to IMO.
You'd also have to be pretty sad to be offended by them sufficiently to want them removed as far as I am concerned. This smacks of Big Brother (as in Orwell*, not the stupid tv program for those who aren't sure).
As ww said, it was extremely useful in the case of newbies posting unfounded rumours.
*He wrote stuff.
Consensus was to get rid. Bozza took sweeping action. End of.
Bring em back
They don't make any difference to me. Though I like to see mine.
Why though?