Lush
Mods' Pet
Somewhere in there is a point. How would we feel if the Goldstone was renamed the Amex Goldstone? However these days it is hopelessly naive (I'd be interested to hear Attila's point of view). No club these days can afford to turn away a major source of income. (Aside from the fact that apparently most of that income is directed into Albion In The Community projects).
How many clubs these days haven't taken the corporate or benefactors shilling re naming their stands?
But it came across as a criticism of the stadium we fought so long and hard for, and that we are proud of as well as a chairman and board who are also fans and without whom we wouldn't be where we are now (in contrast to Ipswich's 'missing' chairman.)
It also comes across as a bit weird when you consider the amount of money that Ipswich have spunked on the wages of players making their way down from the Premier League. It also appears a bit churlish when we as a club try and go out of our way to make opposition fans welcome. Jibes about tractors and six fingers aside.
However I think we have to remember that it only reflects the views of a small minority of Ipswich fans and most are embarrassed by the whole event. No need to villify the whole club or fanbase.
It was a protest that was both misguided and misunderstood. Although I guess it's got people talking.
Anyway thanks for the 3 points it helped us get.