He's cemeted his place in the world's top 4. A good achievement but, ultimately, hasn't done more than Tim/Greg managed. Yet.
He's cemeted his place in the world's top 4. A good achievement but, ultimately, hasn't done more than Tim/Greg managed. Yet.
This debate will probably go away before the end of 2009. I expect him to reach more than one grand slam final before then, and probably win it.I disagree, i think he has already done more than Henman and Rusedski
I wonder if he'll win OVERSEAS sports personality of the year?
This debate will probably go away before the end of 2009. I expect him to reach more than one grand slam final before then, and probably win it.
He's had a good year, and he's getting better.
I'm pleased to see Murray has won in a topsy-turvy final set. Good effort, that.
I don't agree with those saying that what Murray has achieved is the same as Henman and Rusedski. Henman and Rusedski between them won 2 masters series in their combined careers; the same number that Murray has already won. Comparing the number of 'career titles' is somewhat churlish given that Henman and Rusedski both played for around 10 years each and Murray has been playing for what, 4? Despite that, he's already won only 3 fewer than 'Tiger' Tim.
They also both were frequently over-shadowed by the eminent tennis players of their generation. Henman, particularly, struggled against Sampras, whereas Murray has a 4-2 record against Federer (although I think he has a 1-5 record against Nadal?).
Well dug out of that whole.
ps Henman and Rusedski never beat the top players....i cant remember Henman or Rusedski beating Sampras, Agassi, etc who were the top men at that time.
He's won f*** ALL! Why is it the Brits always overreact to a bit of success?