Herne Hill Seagull
Well-known member
Most people who criticise Murray, or don't like him (myself included) have certainly never questioned his abilities. I know he's a terrific player. He's just a tit, so I don't like him.
Indeed. The progress Murray has made in this one year is unbelievable. And when you put it alongside what Henman and Greg achieved in their ENTIRE careers, you realise just how good he is at the age of 21.I don't agree with those saying that what Murray has achieved is the same as Henman and Rusedski. Henman and Rusedski between them won 2 masters series in their combined careers; the same number that Murray has already won. Comparing the number of 'career titles' is somewhat churlish given that Henman and Rusedski both played for around 10 years each and Murray has been playing for what, 4? Despite that, he's already won only 3 fewer than 'Tiger' Tim.
They also both were frequently over-shadowed by the eminent tennis players of their generation. Henman, particularly, struggled against Sampras, whereas Murray has a 4-2 record against Federer (although I think he has a 1-5 record against Nadal?).
Another fine win for the tried and trusted SCOTTISH tennis player v Federer then
Made a major Final...something Henman never acheived
Nice try, but no. Henman made the final of the French Open in 2001(maybe?) and lost to someone. Definitely happened.
Congratulations TSB: You have been assigned Wycombe Wanderers as your second team. You must support them nearly as much as the Albion...
Congratulations TSB: You have been assigned Wycombe Wanderers as your second team. You must support them nearly as much as the Albion...
Well dug out of that whole.
ps Henman and Rusedski never beat the top players....i cant remember Henman or Rusedski beating Sampras, Agassi, etc who were the top men at that time.
At 22 Nadal is only one year older than Murray but is 12-6 vs Federer, 5-1 vs Murray and 10-4 vs Djokovic, so a combined 27-11 vs the rest of the Top 4. THAT is real quality.