Andy D'Urso = What a C,UNT

[RM-Taylor]

What a f***ing c.unt that man is.

In all fairness it was a 50/50 challenge, and should never have been a red card.

What a wanker

 

[B-Rad]

totally agree. but who could agree that was a straight red?! ridiculous, the lino is more to blame, looks like he was the one who advised it was a sending off! pr1ck.

 

[Flavor Flav]

anyone up for fire bombing his house??

 

[Gazwag]

It was a very late challenge, but should maybe have been yellow

 

[saafend_seagull]

u forgetting the fouls on parkin in the box?

 

[R. Slicker]

Are you lot for real? Terrible tackle, deserved what it got.

 

[PILTDOWN MAN]

criminal tackle nearly as bad virgo's defending

 

[seagulls4ever]

Was clearly a red card.

 

[the hitman]

Never a red!

 

[SirDouglasLoft]

I knew he was going to ruin the game, he didn't let it flow at all, and as for the sending of, oh dear.
Was I the only one that thought Parkin should've got a red for going in studs up on Kuipers face right at the end? Kuipers had the ball in his hands, and he lunges straight in.

 

[BigAl]

Thought he gave a ridiculous amount against luton. If it weren't for him the game wouldn't have gone as far as penalties as in my opinion luton were probably the better side before the sending off.

 

[RM-Taylor]

Are you lot for real? Terrible tackle, deserved what it got.

It looked worse than what it was, and their player was play-acting.

Was clearly a red card.

If you watch it again you will see it wasn't

 

[Alex Alex Dawson oo! oo!]

He was nowhere near the ball and the "tackle" was dangerous - you get a red card just for the latter, and deservedly so.

 

[R. Slicker]

More excuses on this thread than mickys post match interview.

 

[R. Slicker]

thought he gave a ridiculous amount against luton. If it weren't for him the game wouldn't have gone as far as penalties as in my opinion luton were probably the better side before the sending off.

cock

 

[lighthouse]

He was nowhere near the ball and the "tackle" was dangerous - you get a red card just for the latter, and deservedly so.

The reason he was nowhere near the ball was because he was trying to block the clearance, not tackle the fella. His trailing leg caught the player, not his leading leg.

not a red full stop

 

[R. Slicker]

The reason he was nowhere near the ball was because he was trying to block the clearance, not tackle the fella. His trailing leg caught the player, not his leading leg.

not a red full stop

If that's not a red, teams need a squad of 50, because they would lose about half their players with broken legs.

 

[Pavilionaire]

A definite red, the turning point of the match.

Firstly, his control is shocking, then he dives in and cathces his opponent heavy giving him a dead leg. As far as I'm concerned Livermore can f*** off to wherever he came from.

 

[Pavilionaire]

A definite red, the turning point of the match.

Firstly, his control is shocking, then he dives in and catches his opponent heavy giving him a dead leg. As far as I'm concerned Livermore can f*** off to wherever he came from.

 

[Easy 10]

Loose ball, 50/50, he's not gone in high, and they are BOTH sliding towards each other. There was nothing malicious whatsoever from Livermore, and he could just have easily have come off worse.
f***ing ridiculous decision.