I completely accept and understand that Ed - so instead of "personal abuse won't be tolerated", maybe the policy should read "please report abusive posts. In extreme cases moderators will ban those responsible"
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
A thread full of banning offences
- Thread starter Withdean Wanderer
- Start date
Dick Knights Mumm
Take me Home Falmer Road
It is quite a simple deal on NSC. If you really don't like how it is run - become a mod - go to another board, or start your own.
But try and leave behind the "look at me" posts.
But try and leave behind the "look at me" posts.
Lord Bracknell
On fire
We would still get criticised for "inconsistency" ...
"His insult was more extreme than mine. But you banned me, not him".
Dick Knights Mumm
Take me Home Falmer Road
But who really cares on that wording. Fine change it. I don't think it will make an ounce of difference to posters who get a kick of seeing what they can get away with.
Brighton till i die
You havin' a bubble?
Couldn't agree more.
Some people take NSC WAY too seriously!!
......Oh yeah, 12 pages EASY!
Uncle Buck
Ghost Writer
- Jul 7, 2003
- 28,071
The original poster might have a point.
Still this should pass the day.
Still this should pass the day.
Just to remind people of the rules
1. No racism
2. Don't be a cock
3. If you don't like something, report it and we'll take a look
1. No racism
2. Don't be a cock
3. If you don't like something, report it and we'll take a look
Yep, that is a good point, although there already is *loads* of inconsistency from the mods especially on the issue of thread removal. I just think it would be better if mods were allowed to ban who they felt needed to be banned. I'm sure they themselves could be held to account for their decisions by God almighty BOZZA if need be.
Probably true too.
I think we are actually, at least THREE mods have been banned themselves, including GOD
The Ringleader
Banned
The amount of grief WW gets is a joke. It's his opponion and he just doesnt wear rose tinted glasses like most of the dicks who give him stick 
Lord Bracknell
On fire
There's a BIG difference between God almighty and Bozza.
For a start ... God almighty doesn't think he is Bozza.
Brighton Breezy
New member
Ain't that the truth.
Brighton Breezy
New member
On the mod application form it was a prerequesite to be one, as is being married, as we are used to being always WRONG.
Brighton till i die
You havin' a bubble?
The amount of grief WW gets is a joke. It's his opponion and he just doesnt wear rose tinted glasses like most of the dicks who give him stick
ATFC Seagull
Aberystwyth Town FC
You left me out.
Tony Meolas Loan Spell
Slut Faced Whores
Cant we all just get along?
Da Man Clay
T'Blades
- Dec 16, 2004
- 16,279
There are only 2 or 3 regular ones granted, but a lot of threads do turn into just abuse. It's annoying really at times because WW does make sone good points (hidden behind the ott sensationalism/negative spin granted) and what could be a good thread turns into an 8 page slanging match.
I agree that at times WW does get what he deserves but some people maybe just need to learn to ignore him if he gets them that worked up.
Don Quixote
Well-known member
- Nov 4, 2008
- 8,362
In that case why the hell haven't i been banned yet?!
Perry's Tracksuit Bottoms
King of Sussex
Dear Withdean Wanderer,
We joined this version of NSC at about the same time. I have never been insulted by anyone here. I notice that you have made about 30 times more posts than me. I'm not sure whether that is significant, but it does bring to mind that old tale about hot kitchens.
I hope this helps.
Best wishes,
Perry's Tracksuit Bottoms
We joined this version of NSC at about the same time. I have never been insulted by anyone here. I notice that you have made about 30 times more posts than me. I'm not sure whether that is significant, but it does bring to mind that old tale about hot kitchens.
I hope this helps.
Best wishes,
Perry's Tracksuit Bottoms