This. What does it live on? I'm going to be hugely disappointed if the answer is something like lettuce.Didn't this chap make an appearance last year? I'll second him. Huge on defence, although falls down a bit in attack...
This. What does it live on? I'm going to be hugely disappointed if the answer is something like lettuce.Didn't this chap make an appearance last year? I'll second him. Huge on defence, although falls down a bit in attack...
The CASSOWARY has always split opinion in this competition, but as there are few feathered contenders so far, I'm going to nominate this giant mental turkey.
Anyone want to second me on this?
This. What does it live on? I'm going to be hugely disappointed if the answer is something like lettuce.
It lives on ANYTHING. It's so small it just eats cells, any cells, plant, animal or bacteria. It has spiky things which pierce the cell membrane and then they suck all the insides out. Hell, this little bastard can eat Salmonella!
christ you are one heck of a plonker,so this thread is based on small animals or reptiles etc?how the fu-k can you say that a probably the worlds strongest animal(tiger)is not conpetition for a tin pot honey badger?so its about if a animal was bigger or is it about facts?you sir are a fiction freak.
Seems to be a obsession with honey badgers and i can't think why.I get attacked by wasps and flys but does that make them hard compared to my size?
Absolute gubbins. If my auntie had bollocks and all that.
Look, a tiger-sized mongoose would be a new animal, not a mongoose. Or are you just going to discount anything bigger than a honey badger because it would lose if it was pound for pound smaller? By your reckoning we should all be voting for the ant, as I reckon it would throw 15 of your honey badgers into a cliff face all at once, with consumate ease if it was supersized up to honey badger size, given that the ant is so incredibly strong for its bodyweight.
No, it doesn't work like that. Take each animal on its own merit.
But you contradict yourself in the pound-for-pound argument for previously dismissing the mosquito for its 'itsy-bitsyness'. A tiger-sized mongoose or honey badger would certainly be a formidable foe, but nothing would have me shitting my pants more than seeing a tiger-sized Mosquito coming at me...
Edit: in other words, the same as what zfleas says in the post above mine.
How many hard blind people do you know?
You still don't understand what the criteria for HARD is! No it's not only based on small animals. The Orca is hardy f***ing small, is it? But it will take down massive whales much bigger than it. So it's HARD. Speak to turienzo, he is in charge, and he will tell you it is about the hardest animal POUND FOR POUND.
No, I'm not. As I've said above, the Orca should be there. The Bull Shark should be there. Both f***ing HARD animals. They shouldn't be penalised because they happen to be big, because if something even bigger comes along they'll still go steaming into it. A massive Tiger eating a big Deer is not HARD.
Come on Sim, you know the criteria. I know you hate the Honey Badger but you have to admit it fits the criteria of the competiton.
You think? Yes, I would be f***ing scared of a massive mosquito. BUT, who would win between a Tiger sized Mosquito and a Tiger? The Tiger would tear it apart I reckon. The Mosquito cant even SEE, for a start. How many hard blind people do you know?
But it would have a f*** of great hypodermic needle sticking out of its FACE.
This is shaping up to be a classic.
It lives on ANYTHING. It's so small it just eats cells, any cells, plant, animal or bacteria. It has spiky things which pierce the cell membrane and then they suck all the insides out. Hell, this little bastard can eat Salmonella!
OK, a bit outside the box this one, but I'm going for the tiny water bear, also known as a tardigrade, these things make cockroaches look f***ing fragile.
Most of the things said about cockroaches are myths, they would NOT survive the radiation of a nuclear bomb, however, water bears would. These things don't get much bigger than 1mm but just TRY and kill it. The Immortal Jellyfish might be called immortal, but these things virtually are.
They are the only known animal to survive at close to absolute zero temperature (-273C), they also survive quite happily in boiling water (they've survived a temperature of 151C), and can live for a decade (yes, 10 years) with no water at all. Not only that, they can survive radiation doses 1000x higher than any other animal. In 2007, they sent the buggers into space. They even survived that. Not only can they survive the zero pressure of space, they can survive in a pressure of 6000 atmospheres (which would crush the humble cockcroach instantly, that's 6 times the water pressure in the deepest ocean trench). They can also survive most poisons.
Unlike cockroaches they're also too small to stamp to death.
There isn't an animal in this list that could kill a tardigrade, nor one that could survive the conditions they can. They live all over the world, they've been found in hot springs, on top of Everest and in both the Antarctic and the Sahara.
Damn that's one hard little fella.
Which reminds me, IMO the totals should be withheld until the poll is CLOSED.A CLASSIC WHC match up to whet the appetite:
2010 World's Hardest Creature, Savage 16 Round, Orca vs Honey Badger
This is the Honey Badger's year.
Which reminds me, IMO the totals should be withheld until the poll is CLOSED.
And from that very thread:
Yes. It is one of the options (along with multi choice, public/private etc).that's a good idea although i'd have no idea how to do it
is it even possible?