Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Politics] Trump under fire.







Jul 20, 2003
20,415
In the land of many very stupid people who have access to as many weapons as a small army, then any use of metaphors, no matter how clearly they are in context not literal, then it is probably worth not using bullseye, crosshairs, target, going after, getting rid of, or any allusion to a literal interpretation.

However to conflate Trump’s part in Jan 06 and not accepting an election defeat, to the use of ‘bullseye’ in a clear reference to an election race (note it’s not actually a race, that’s a metaphor, maybe a similie …) is a bit ridiculous.

I was taught that the way to remember it was that people who don't know the difference between a metaphor and a simile are thick shits as opposed to being thick as shit.





(I'm sure you realise that this isn't meant as an insult but given the nature of some discussions on here nowadays I want to make it clear that it isn't)
 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
52,093
Goldstone
Looks like a bullet sized hole to me in the top half of his ear

I'm not sure that's possible. If a bullet were travelling at the correct angle to make a hole like that, it would have hit his head. If the bullet was whizzing past his head, it would have taken more of his ear.
 


JamesAndTheGiantHead

Well-known member
Sep 2, 2011
6,339
Worthing
IMG_8643.jpeg
 








A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
19,930
Deepest, darkest Sussex


nwgull

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2003
14,363
Manchester
It's mad that a few millimetres and his head would've been blown off on live TV.
It's probably real but because of who it is you can't help but question it..
It’s hard to imagine, even when it involves Trump, that a shot being fired so close to his head would be anything by a genuine attempt to take him out. Sounds like a major secret service f*** up though.
 




Seagull58

In the Algarve
Jan 31, 2012
8,031
Vilamoura, Portugal
I'm not sure that's possible. If a bullet were travelling at the correct angle to make a hole like that, it would have hit his head. If the bullet was whizzing past his head, it would have taken more of his ear.
If the bullet was moving parallel to the side of his head, passing through his ear from the front or the back, it seems reasonable that it would make this wound.
 

Attachments

  • 1000005400.png
    1000005400.png
    998.5 KB · Views: 41










Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
52,093
Goldstone
If the bullet was moving parallel to the side of his head, passing through his ear from the front or the back, it seems reasonable that it would make this wound.

It would have to be a tiny bullet.

I'd say that we'll find out soon, but I imagine Trump will be thinking about how to spin it, rather than just reporting the truth.
 








KZNSeagull

Well-known member
Nov 26, 2007
20,821
Wolsingham, County Durham
A little more for the conspiracy theorists: According to the BBC article, the gunman had no ID on him and has been identified by the FBI using DNA. Quick work from the feds there, I wonder if they had his DNA on file already? And if so, why?

 


Triggaaar

Well-known member
Oct 24, 2005
52,093
Goldstone
He initially puts his hand to his ear, before going down.

Maybe there was a bang of some sort. Can anyone confirm if there was a loud bang?
 






TomandJerry

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2013
12,323
The suspected shooter at yesterday’s rally shooting in Butler, Pennsylvania, had explosive devices in his car, the Wall Street Journal reports.

According to sources familiar with the matter who spoke to the outlet, the car with the reported devices was parked near the rally where Donald Trump addressed a crowd before his assassination attempt.

The Journal further reports that police received multiple reports of suspicious packages near the shooter’s location and that bomb technicians were dispatched.
 




Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here