Icy Gull
Back on the rollercoaster
- Jul 5, 2003
- 72,015
At least we can put to bed the notion we can’t win without wilf playing
do cup games count
Where are ya?
At least we can put to bed the notion we can’t win without wilf playing
do cup games count
Where are ya?
They’ll be on the new “Hodgson OUT” thread on the BBS http://www.cpfc.org/forums/showthread.php?t=276423
As Bob Marley says
"No Zaha No points, No Zaha No points"
I must have missed it but why did old grass stained knees miss today’s game?
I must have missed it but why did old grass stained knees miss today’s game?
I assume you're just kidding?Fall out with Parish again - still not made up from the fall out of one unfollowing the other on twitter. I hear it’s toxic in that dressing room from a very well placed source...
Bromley chairman causing bother again?I assume you're just kidding?
I assume you're just kidding?
Bromley chairman causing bother again?
So why did Zaha sign a new contract? Obviously it's for more money, but if he wants out soon, that money in the short term isn't a big deal and not worth scuppering a move.Fall out with Parish again - still not made up from the fall out of one unfollowing the other on twitter. I hear it’s toxic in that dressing room from a very well placed source...
So why did Zaha sign a new contract? Obviously it's for more money, but if he wants out soon, that money in the short term isn't a big deal and not worth scuppering a move.
The only exception I can think of is if his new contract has a decent release clause in it.
Not if it made it more difficult for me to leave.Wouldn't you sign a new contract for the improved financial return
The price is not irrelevant though.If a top club wants to sign him they will and the term of his current contract would not be too much of a hindrance.
So why did Zaha sign a new contract? Obviously it's for more money, but if he wants out soon, that money in the short term isn't a big deal and not worth scuppering a move.
The only exception I can think of is if his new contract has a decent release clause in it.
So why did Zaha sign a new contract? Obviously it's for more money, but if he wants out soon, that money in the short term isn't a big deal and not worth scuppering a move.
The only exception I can think of is if his new contract has a decent release clause in it.
Brighton have been awarded 10 penalties in the Premier League since the start of last season (scoring seven), a joint-high along with Crystal Palace.
Exactly.I think Palace value him more highly than the market as otherwise he would not still be at Selhurst. No doubt that was making its way to an agent and you can imagine lots of ‘you are pricing me out of a big move’ negotiations that resulted in the large salary increase.
For Zaha he has another season at a club he knows on good money so will ride it out until a club meet the clubs valuation safe in the knowledge he is racking up some serious cash in his account