Do you also hold the details of BHAFC1993 when they forced local businesses into accepting a % of debts? Only we fair we highlight both clubs financial indiscretions. TIA
You lot are always the victims aren't you? It's never your fault!
Do you also hold the details of BHAFC1993 when they forced local businesses into accepting a % of debts? Only we fair we highlight both clubs financial indiscretions. TIA
You lot are always the victims aren't you? It's never your fault!
Do you also hold the details of BHAFC1993 when they forced local businesses into accepting a % of debts? Only we fair we highlight both clubs financial indiscretions. TIA
It was a straight forward question, What are you on about?
I have no idea how I managed to miss Glenn Master of the Dark Arts Murray from my assessment of Albion cheats.I make that assessment about right.
If there's one player in the current squad who actively LOOKS for contact, to win a free kick, its Murray.
The only Albion player of 'recent' times that was a bona fide CHEAT, in terms of simulation, was Leon Knight - and I HATED him for it.
Of course they compare them, it's all they've got.Your arrogance astounds me... to even think about comparing situations beggars belief...
Arrogance? Are you the full ticket Nutz?Your arrogance astounds me... to even think about comparing situations beggars belief...
Arrogance? Are you the full ticket Nutz?
I wasn't comparing the situations, I was just highlighting that BHAFC1993 aren't as squeaky clean as you would like to believe.
Who are BHAFC1993? I can work out what you're inferring, but it's made up nonsense. You went into admin (twice) and so you think 'let's just pretend they did the same'. We didn't. We didn't go into administration, and creditors weren't forced to accept anything.I wasn't comparing the situations, I was just highlighting that BHAFC1993 aren't as squeaky clean as you would like to believe.
Yeah but...but...but.Who are BHAFC1993? I can work out what you're inferring, but it's made up nonsense. You went into admin (twice) and so you think 'let's just pretend they did the same'. We didn't. We didn't go into administration, and creditors weren't forced to accept anything.
Do you also hold the details of BHAFC1993 when they forced local businesses into accepting a % of debts? Only we fair we highlight both clubs financial indiscretions. TIA
I have never seen details of what you refer to, so perhaps you would be so good as to post your evidence. I can show you your breakdown of the last administration if you require it?
Very surprised Izquierdo's dive against Burnley hasn't had a mention on this thread, worst I've seen this season.
Do you also hold the details of BHAFC1993 when they forced local businesses into accepting a % of debts? Only we fair we highlight both clubs financial indiscretions. TIA
Of course I don't expect any reasoned argument back, but it's worth highlighting their nonsense so that the less informed Brighton fan who stumbles across these threads can see the truth.Yeah but...but...but.
You are wasting your breath with these GOONS.
The wonderfully informed has El Presidente has previously talked about it on here before. Perhaps he could arrange for the evidence to be distributed to all BHAFC1993 fans so they know the full history of their club.
I know all the details of our 2 admins, the last one was for a debt of around £30m. About £10million less than Brighton1993 lost in their season buying promotion to the top league...
Repeating a made up name to hope to compare our great club to your bunch of cheaters is just trolling. Palace fans are welcome here to talk football and give their perspective, but if you're just going to troll you might get banned.Perhaps he could arrange for the evidence to be distributed to all BHAFC1993 fans so they know the full history of their club.
Firstly, who the **** are Brighton 1993? Secondly, why are you comparing money you conned out of businesses to money that our wealthy owner has invested? Thirdly, we didn't buy promotion, we spent a lot less than our rivals, and still finished above them.I know all the details of our 2 admins, the last one was for a debt of around £30m. About £10million less than Brighton1993 lost in their season buying promotion to the top league...
Do you also hold the details of BHAFC1993 when they forced local businesses into accepting a % of debts? Only we fair we highlight both clubs financial indiscretions. TIA
You're only surprised because you didn't look very hard.
It was a shocking dive, that was castigated by Albion fans at the game, and on here, and HAS been highlighted in this thread.
Must try harder.
Your 'BHAFC1993' line is pathetic trolling. You know perfectly well that the Albion have never gone out of business, have never gone into administration, and have never had to reform - not in 1993, nor at any other time in the club's 117 year history.
It isn't any secret that the club was in dire financial straits at (various) times in the 90s, nor is it any secret that the club renegotiated various debts owed around that time. To lie about what that entailed, to try to deflect from Palace's past situation, makes you look a complete cock.
So lets get this straight. You went into administration and had 98% of your debts written off. in 1999 you went under with £22m worth of debt, and then you did it again in 2010 this time with around £30m worth of debt. So you've stiffed your creditors to the tune of £50m+. They had no choice but to accept their 2p in the £.
In 1995, BHA sold the Goldstone Ground, and came to an agreement with their creditors - AN AGREEMENT - big difference, to pay a % of what was then owed (a figure which totalled somewhere between £4m-£6m).
You cannot seriously compare what your shysters and spivs at CPFC2000 and CPFC2010 did, and what happened at BHA. Well I suppose YOU can, because you can't even call a dive when you see it. But to any normal person who is not a one-eyed, myopic Palace muppet, there is a WORLD of difference.