Mammoth
Kickin' back
Did they change the spelling of naive? Or maybe knave?
What an idiot the OP is. All she is asking for is an evidence based approach. Given the ridiculous sums of money we are spending on the War On Drugs wouldn't it be a good idea to see if it was being well spent.
She got very broad support for that on QT this evening. The only panelist against an evidence based approach was the completely out of touch Tory.
With Caroline Lucas on the rampage in Brighton Pavilion and Norman Baker saying the same thing in Lewes, I can only assume that the good citizens of Kemp Town feel completely besieged.
I think Caroline will look at this thread and feel it could be a catalyst for a turning tide of support.
On the other hand, she might not see it.
She goes by the name of ERNEST on NSC.
I had breakfast with her, she had a Full VEGAN European.
Full vegan or fully shaven European?
She does cut through all the political crap on these issues. We need more politicians like her in parliament.
She got very broad support for that on QT this evening. The only panelist against an evidence based approach was the completely out of touch Tory.
It's near BN3 and BN2 . It's where literally everyone in RH16 longs to be . So I am told
That doesn't help. Where is RH16?It's near BN3 and BN2 . It's where literally everyone in RH16 longs to be . So I am told
Tristrum Hunt wasn't far away from the Tory's stance. He was very careful what he said and didn't fully commit to supporting the evidence based approach. Pity because normally Mr Hunt comes across quite well.
With Caroline Lucas on the rampage in Brighton Pavilion and Norman Baker saying the same thing in Lewes, I can only assume that the good citizens of Kemp Town feel completely besieged.
It's near BN3 and BN2 . It's where literally everyone in RH16 longs to be . So I am told
Allowed Lucas to further use her self serving position of MP for pavilion to spout rubbish about drug laws. Who will vote for her this time?
Hopefully the pompous middle aged men who were influenced and coerced by their matriarchal partners will have learnt a harsh lesson as to how a good cositiutuency MP should serve their constituents . In her case not at all.
I miss Lepper I really do.
You're a "journalist", and you can't spell naive?
"Self serving position of MP"? I'm not sure what that even means. She was elected and she serves as an MP?
The fact that you think only people who were "influenced and coerced by their matriarchal partners" would vote for Lucas is sexist horseshit.
Your personal vendetta against her is tiresome in the extreme - some of us remember the libellous rubbish you posted when she was involved in the fracking protests.
Exactly why do you find her so threatening, Timmy?[/QUOTE]
She exists out of every frame of reference he knows (not saying much, I'll grant you)
& is a woman with an opinion and a platform who is not his sainted Margaret
What an idiot the OP is. All she is asking for is an evidence based approach. Given the ridiculous sums of money we are spending on the War On Drugs wouldn't it be a good idea to see if it was being well spent.
She got very broad support for that on QT this evening. The only panelist against an evidence based approach was the completely out of touch Tory.
Allowed Lucas to further use her self serving position of MP for pavilion to spout rubbish about drug laws. Who will vote for her this time?
Corrected for you
You see what the Mods on NSC have done now?
Allowed HB&B to further use his regular position of NSC attention-seeking mega-bore to spout reactionary rubbish about every topic under the Sun. Who still takes him seriously, and why?