Maybe he is trying to bring in extra income via additional investment - we just don't know. There is also financial fair play to bear in mind as well as being sustainable. If it was your business and had lost what we had in the last 2 years would you plough even more in? Maybe you would.
Perhaps Tony is trying to sell the soul of the club to potential investors in the Middle East or some Russian Oligarch but from what I can see, he is trying (and barely succeeding) to keep the club afloat so we don't end up being the next Portsmouth or Sunderland.
As you say it's a matter of opinions, and that is fine, but I personally would rather see the club reduce it's debts and become more sustainable even if it means us bumbling around the bottom third of the best league in the world. Until such time as Tony sells the club to some money magnet, I am happy with the way the club is being operated, even if the results we all want to see are hard to come by. From nearly going to the wall 25 years ago to 13th in the Premier League - hmm, real life problems?
I’m fine with being sustainable and think Tony is fantastic but on this particular issue doing the same thing over and over and hoping things turn out differently doesn’t make any sense and it’s simply not working. So let’s mix it up, sell Bissouma and sell Trossard and invest that money in a new forward. Sure it’s a gamble but i can’t see how it can bring less than the options we have now.
Or, sell Duffy, Clarke, Connolly, Molumby and Bissouma and don’t renew the wages of Lallana and for one year forgo signing so many up and coming youngsters to put all that money into that one player.
We are a fantastically run club and long may that continue but we went into this season with forward options that included Locadia and Connolly alongside an injury prone Welbeck and hit and miss Maupay. We are now paying the price and people are blaming Potter for such poor recruitment.