[Football] Yes another Potter thread....

[Thunder Bolt]

I guess yes it would be possible.

Then nothing wrong will have occurred.

 

[symyjym]

Then nothing wrong will have occurred.

I am not claiming that anything wrong happened. What I said on the other thread was that it must have been as good as a done deal before Hughton was dismissed.

The club only had to get permission from Swansea to open official and direct talks on negotiating a deal. It would have only been "illegal" if he signed for us without informing Swansea first.

We don't know who contacted who by the way, I just said that it was possible to your previous comment.

 

[The_Viper]

Yes it does, enjoy re-reading

https://nortr3nixy.nimpr.uk/showthread.php?372739-Graham-Potter-joins-on-four-year-deal&highlight=potter

Literally on the first page of the site too ffs.

 

[SIMMO SAYS]

Yes it has and that hat is exactly what I said.

What hat you on about

 

[Sussex Nomad]

I bought a new potter, hoping to get my handicap down.

 

[Da Man Clay]

Yes it has and that hat is exactly what I said.

No it hasn’t.

I wouldn’t have mentioned the bold bit if i’d seen it on this thread - apologies if you had mentioned it somewhere else.

 

[Guinness Boy]

Yes another Potter thread because the NSC search function does not work.

On the original Potter thread, that I cannot find, I made the statement that we must have already been in contact with Potter before we ended Hughton's contract.

This was met with several posters claiming that this was untrue because of the claim that this would be illegal.

However just to prove my point to those claims. From the article: https://www.football365.com/news/graham-potter-brighton-and-an-attempted-revolution

"This is why Potter was targeted by Brighton, with whispers that discussions between the two parties took place as early as February as owner Tony Bloom looked to take the club into a new era."

Are we now in trouble?

Rough translation - I just wanted some attention while I posted my comment again.

No need for search, several Potter threads on page one and two including one about Football365

https://nortr3nixy.nimpr.uk/showthread.php?373217-Football365-article-on-Potter


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[neilbard]

I bought a new potter, hoping to get my handicap down.

Me too..

 

[DavePage]

What hat you on about

Potter has a sorting hat, that will determine who plays in defence, up front, mid and goal.......apparently

 

[perseus]

Head hunters could be freelance?

 

[symyjym]

Rough translation - I just wanted some attention while I posted my comment again.

No need for search, several Potter threads on page one and two including one about Football365

https://nortr3nixy.nimpr.uk/showthread.php?373217-Football365-article-on-Potter


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

****, now ban me.

All my search found was:

 

[Guinness Boy]

****, now ban me.

All my search found was:

View attachment 110362

I said “no need for search”. Is your mouse broken?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[symyjym]

I said “no need for search”. Is your mouse broken?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I was searching for the thread where I made the comment and what posters I made it to.

NSC search has never worked and it's not worthy Premier League standard because of laziness. That is my point.

 

[neilbard]

I said “no need for search”. Is your mouse broken?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Guinness Boy]

I was searching for the thread where I made the comment and what posters I made it to.

NSC search has never worked and it's not worthy Premier League standard because of laziness. That is my point.

The search is a standard database wildcard so it will give you all the threads that contain those words. Google is better, because it’s a search engine and not a message board. Did you try that?

Nevertheless you can click on your own profile to see your post history without a search. Or you could have commented on the Football365 thread which was staring you in the face.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[dazzer6666]

Originally sourced from The Martlets, Burgess Hill ?

Not now, the cafe has moved and is apparently no longer used by those ITK (my next door neighbour’s daughter owns it)

 

[Paulie Gualtieri]

Although I don’t have an ounce of proof I heard pre official contact an elaborate dead drop system was deployed within shepherds pies of a well known retailer


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Dolph Ins]

Having found NSC search less than efficient I took Bozzer's advice and now use Google search which tends to get results. NSC search is effing useless.

 

[symyjym]

The search is a standard database wildcard so it will give you all the threads that contain those words. Google is better, because it’s a search engine and not a message board. Did you try that?

Nevertheless you can click on your own profile to see your post history without a search. Or you could have commented on the Football365 thread which was staring you in the face.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes I could have gone through 3 weeks of my posts but when the site has a search option one would expect it to work. If it doesn't work the function should be deleted from the site.

By the way I tried Google and didn't find the thread I wanted either, but that is a really ****ed up way of having to search.

Just go and do one, we have history and you need to ignore my posts rather than pick on them because it will never end well with your attitude to me.

 

[symyjym]

Having found NSC search less than efficient I took Bozzer's advice and now use Google search which tends to get results. NSC search is effing useless.

You would have thought that after all these years and now being in the Prem, and with outside users viewing this site that it would be more professional. It is fixable and most other football forums searches work, why not this one?