- Jul 7, 2003
- 47,630
They weren't remotely dirty: if anything we were marginally dirtier than them but it wasn't a dirty game in the slightest. So now the only gentle patronising that's going on around here is in your general direction, for being wrong. There, there.
To be fair, there were two awful tackles that could easily have resulted in red cards, but I'd like to <think> they weren't made with ill intent, more like the result of a higher level player thinking and moving fractionally quicker than a non league one, if that doesn't sound too condescending. I wouldn't say they were a dirty side as such.