In Canada, having returned from the UK yesterday, we have been asked to self isolate.
For me this is two weeks of not earning. My girlfriend has reduced earning. It's going to be tough to make rent and bills.
I'm due to fly to Canada, early May for two weeks hols. Would that mean it would be two weeks self isolation for us or have you a particular scenario to self isolate?
If you were employed and woke up feeling a bit ropey. Would you take the hit and live on 90 quid a week for two weeks or just not mention it? Asking people to be responsible is all very well, but most can’t afford to.
Is your uni not going to continue with teaching and learning activity online?Luckily all teaching has been suspended (I work at a uni in London) and there will be no financial consequences..
I feel very sorry for those who can't self isolate owing to finances or circumstances. But few are forced to go to work when ill, surely? What company would insist on that?
Pretty much every company. To be fair with low wage workers sick pay can become extra holiday but even so you are forced to work while sick or face sanctiions.
meant to be going over in June for 3 weeks. Doubtful that will happen to be honest
areIf we get ill we can and will self isolate (to protect the old and frail neighbours). Luckily all teaching has been suspended (I work at a uni in London) and there will be no financial consequences..
I feel very sorry for those who can't self isolate owing to finances or circumstances. But few are forced to go to work when ill, surely? What company would insist on that?
Self isolation when not ill doesn't make sense to me unless you are in a high vulnerability group (with a view to protecting youself), and if so it is unlikely you are full time employed. Such people should be helped by government immediately, though.
Fit people who decide to go to work even though they know they are ill, and infect people leading to the death of the vulnerable could be charged with culpable homice, though, surely?