Every player has his price. Admittedly it would take very silly money to prise away the likes of Dunk or Stephens - and I've no idea what the required amount would be - but if someone was willing to pay it, off they would trot.
I was thinking the same [emoji106]Elvis £50M...
I would put a higher price on Norwood than Lua Lua.the rest is about right IMHO.which will upset the Ince admireers.
Knocky, £40 mill+
Probably right, although I can't believe the earlier poster who claimed Skalak is worth 2.5m and LuaLua 1m. Both figures are wildly inflated in my opinion, and in any case, is Skalak two and a half times the player that LuaLua is? I don't think so.
Probably right, although I can't believe the earlier poster who claimed Skalak is worth 2.5m and LuaLua 1m. Both figures are wildly inflated in my opinion, and in any case, is Skalak two and a half times the player that LuaLua is? I don't think so.
Interesting thread. Disappointed to see the lack of appreciation of Skalak and Hemed. We have to register 25 players in the Premier League. These two are current internationals, assist makers and goal scorers. Why would we let them go to bring in a few million when we need players for a squad rather than money in the bank? With a decent pre-season ahead of him, I think Skalak will prove the doubters wrong. I have a theory that that the same fans who don't rate him didn't rate Ashley Barnes either. But then I also have this dream that Rohan Ince will get a game for us in the Premier League and prove to be a midfield giant after all!
1 year left :Every player has their price. However if we get the right signings in I think Norwood and perhaps Skalak and Hemed could be surplus to requirements. I'm a big fan of Ince but he does t seem to get CHs support and he might go. I'd prefer he went for another loan though. Does anyone have a definitive list of which of our players have only a year on their contract?