Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
What would be the point if it would only be a retaliation? Everyone in the country would be dead anyway.
There is no button. The pm writes a letter which is kept in the submarines in case we are attacked.
Rubbish.
What would be the point if it would only be a retaliation? Everyone in the country would be dead anyway.
There is no button. The pm writes a letter which is kept in the submarines in case we are attacked.
Indeed.If a significant chunk of Russia's 3,000 nuclear warheads have landed here, I really couldn't care less whether we were able to 'retaliate' or not. Whats the POINT?
I dont think that any administration in the UK would ever consider a pre-emptive strike but, in response to incoming missiles
That is where we would be but we would only have a short time frame in which to react ( 2-4 minutes)
That is why a nuclear war is (hopefully) unlikely as it would destroy everything in or around target areas most certainly both major cities and strategic targets.
Just suppose - in a parallel universe - Labour win the next election and Corbyn becomes PM.
All Prime Ministers have to sign a letter in their first week in office, giving authority to their deputy to order a nuclear strike should the situation arise, if the PM is incapacitated or abroad.
So we also need to know what Tom Watson's stance is on this.