Would you be happy with Tim Sherwood?

[stss30]

Definitive yes or no poll, no fence sitting. Obviously early in the betting but he's a firm favorite at the moment it seems...

 

[Springal]

No. Tactically he was poor at Spurs.

 

[big nuts]

Inexperienced but has a good reputation as a coach, hasn't done badly at Spurs in difficult circumstances so I would be happy with him.

Happy with Sherwood, Steve Clarke or Malkay Mackay any of those three would be good appointments.

 

[The Oldman]

Just do not like the man.

 

[Mellotron]

 

[stss30]

Just do not like the man.

I agree, plus according to one of my mates who supports Spurs he is very tactically limited.

 

[Blue Valkyrie]

No way.

Execrable choice.

Sherwood OUT !

 

[DavidinSouthampton]

I am sure we can do better. Our intelligence network will be in touch with some flair Spaniard who is currently coaching the Outer Mongolian Women's team.

 

[skipper734]

Warren Aspinall thinks he would be a good choice. However he is a friend of Warren's. Any friend of Warren is good enough for me.

 

[Rogero]

Yes good choice. Who else is available?

 

[Hamilton]

No. Has he done anything to prove himself?

 

[GolfingGull]

If Spurs believed that he was good enough for them, then he's good enough for us. It didn't work out for him there, but neither did AVB and Redknapp. Doesn't make him useless. We are Championship Brighton, remember, not some European powerhouse who have the pick of Europe's top managers. Sherwood would be a coup for us, a young Brit with good potential and loads of English football experience.

 

[Driver8]

No. Can't stand the bloke.

 

[Justice]

I agree, plus according to one of my mates who supports Spurs he is very tactically limited.

Just like our previous manager then.

 

[sussexslanter]

If he is available and we can afford him then I'm happy with him. Those parameters aren't going to lead to generating a list of that many people I've heard of right now.

 

[Kuipers Supporters Club]

He was poor at Spurs? No he wasn't - they had near 60% win ratio under him.

 

[catfish]

NO.

 

[Breesy1]

Yes, subject to back room staff arrangements

 

[Mellotron]

He was poor at Spurs? No he wasn't - they had near 60% win ratio under him.

After spending 2 BILLION pounds on players, that's not THAT good. He also got battered by many of the top teams, and was quite clearly making it up as he went along tactics wise.

 

[MattBackHome]

No thanks. I would like a manager who can manage.