Would you accept 7m for ULLOA?

[One Teddy Maybank]

No. £10m and Chris Wood.

 

[brightonmark1234]

No. £10m and Chris Wood.

why does chris wood name get mentioned all the time

 

[British Bulldog]

why does chris wood name get mentioned all the time

Because he's a good player and with CMS playing off him they could make a lethal partnership.

 

[El Sid]

Not even on the bench tonight - he's off.

 

[Napper]

Hope completed tomorrow then so we can get spending

 

[knocky1]

Ask me tomorrow.

 

[Justice]

I'm going to ask the question if we had paid £7m for Ulloa would you think: A. What a waste of money we have been mugged off. B. Hes good but not worth £7m Or C. Hes worth every penny of £7m.

I would be B.

 

[Hyperion]

I'm going to ask the question if we had paid £7m for Ulloa would you think: A. What a waste of money we have been mugged off. B. Hes good but not worth £7m Or C. Hes worth every penny of £7m.

I would be B.

Agreed. At times he seems like an utter lump

 

[nwgull]

It's all relative. If the said £7M was all to be given to Sammi to reinvest in a replacement, then yes. If the majority of it was to be swallowed up by other things and only say £2M identified for a replacement, then no.

So say this hypothetical 5m hole that the club needs to cover existed. How else would suggest it's paid for: Either use part of the large transfer fee? Alternatively, put up the price of every season ticket by £200+VAT?

Whatever the money is used for is irrelevant. 7m is a very good price for a 28 year old 2nd division player.

 

[bhawoddy]

nope want the 10 million the club want for ulloa

Not being greedy at all then?

Perhaps that 10m tag is so they get the 7m offer they want...

 

[One Teddy Maybank]

why does chris wood name get mentioned all the time

Because he is a very good player, as he has demonstrated against us and also whilst he was with us.

When we were in League 1, he was only 18!

 

[Puppet Master]

So come on gazzer, what do you know

 

[wellquickwoody]

7 million PLUS add ons, job done.

 

[Blue Valkyrie]

Absolutely not.

10 - 11 million.

 

[British Bulldog]

I'm going to ask the question if we had paid £7m for Ulloa would you think: A. What a waste of money we have been mugged off. B. Hes good but not worth £7m Or C. Hes worth every penny of £7m.

I would be B.

I'd say C as he's got that ability to tuck away a goal from a single chance in a very tight game, You can't coach that it's a natural ability.

 

[nwgull]

I'd say C as he's got that ability to tuck away a goal from a single chance in a very tight game, You can't coach that it's a natural ability.

I'd say B. He's not clinical at all and has missed plenty of sitters.

 

[moggy]

If they can't afford the 10m, I'd tell them not to be a Jesse , go invest in a Winnebago, get the glassware and set up in the outback and cook

 

[Brownstuff]

Obviously take if you compare him to similar strikers in that price range

 

[Thunder Bolt]

He's done quite well for us in the 18 months that he's played for us, and it would be £5 million profit on his cost, so yes, I would take it.

 

[BrianWade4]

Yes. And looks like the club would

Not worth more than £4m in my humble opinion (although Fulham paying £11m for MacCormack makes it all look crazy nuts)