Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
would 0-1 be better for us that 1-0 after the first leg ?
- Thread starter wardy wonder land
- Start date
Tyrone Biggums
Well-known member
Some people on here really are stupid!!!!!!!
Are you seriously saying going into the 2nd game a goal down is much better than going into it winning
He's simply suggesting which line of psychology may benefit us over 2 legs.
A goal up and in the minds of players you've got something to lose i.e a 1-0 lead. This can cause players to bottle it in such a pressure situation..
A goal down and you play like you've got nothing to lose and attack, attack, attack.
Er, yeah, but it's still better to go in 1 up with something to lose, than it is to be a goal down (when in reality, you're still under pressure with a place in the final to lose). It's a ridiculous question, and no amount of 'what ifs' can change that.
Given the amount of Resident Palace we have, I'm amazed there are still NO Palace win votes!
That's because Palace fans are intelligent folk, and know that it's better for them to LOSE the first leg. Duh.
Excellent logic. Sorry, that was a bit SLOW of me.
Tyrone Biggums
Well-known member
Of course you'd like to be up by goal.
Going by our record we're a far better team to be in front.
If you ask Bradford fans though they might think that going in a goal down actually spurred the team on to play far more attacking football in the second leg.
billy big molluscs
New member
Seems pretty unanimous!
wardy wonder land
Active member
- Dec 10, 2007
- 792
- Thread starter
- #50
This ^^^^
so many react without actually reading the question, - tis about the mind-set of the players and the task in hand to complete the job
the wording on the poll is wrong as well
obviously i would prefer to dick them 5+ nil but no mentalist or insanite is going to believe that will happen
plus - did no-one spot the spelling mistake
Let me put the pro Palace score first voters minds straight....
In order to win football matches you have to put the football into the opposition teams goal more times than they put the football into your teams goal. If having achieved that you then get another opportunity to play at Wembley to attempt to do this all over again. If you win that match you get to play in the premier league.
Giving our fiercest rivals a goal start would not make this challenge any easier to do and may result in me eating my fingernails, fingers, forearms and possibly my elbows too!
Comprende?
Therefore (in the words of Simon Cowell
It's a NO from me
In order to win football matches you have to put the football into the opposition teams goal more times than they put the football into your teams goal. If having achieved that you then get another opportunity to play at Wembley to attempt to do this all over again. If you win that match you get to play in the premier league.
Giving our fiercest rivals a goal start would not make this challenge any easier to do and may result in me eating my fingernails, fingers, forearms and possibly my elbows too!
Comprende?
Therefore (in the words of Simon Cowell
It's a NO from me
The Wizard
Well-known member
- Jul 2, 2009
- 18,401
57-0 - Thats rather resounding 
BensGrandad
New member
I hope that we do as we did in the 1991 semis and win convincingly in the first leg so the 2nd is a formality although in 1991 we played at home first and still won at The Den.
No, we read the question and we understood it. We've got more chance of winning the tie (over two legs) if we win the first leg 1-0, than if we lose 1-0.
Don't flatter yourself that we didn't understand the question, just because you've been caught posting the most stupid question in NSC history.
The Wizard
Well-known member
- Jul 2, 2009
- 18,401
TnL_CPFC - The person who voted for 'We lose 1-0' glad to see you agree with us, cheers.
PWA
European Tour 2023/24
I would like to win.
TSB
Captain Hindsight
