Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[Football] World Cup Opening Game



Stat Brother

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
73,888
West west west Sussex
The Russian players today, written off as hopeless by the entire world beforehand, demonstrated amazing athletism. Each one faster, more powerful, with greater stamina, than their opponents. Almost as if on steroids and amphetamines.

No drug can make a player kick a ball straight.
 




southstandandy

WEST STAND ANDY
Jul 9, 2003
6,048
This is why I'm against a 48 team tournament from 2026. 24 teams in the past was perhaps too few, maybe 32 now is just about ok, but in 8 years time with 48 teams even Scotland might qualify!

My biggest fear is the diluting of the tournament if too many teams make it to the finals in the future. We will start to see huge scores in more and more matches, and even though it was great to see a few goals today, ultimately the match was as boring as hell. Saudi Arabia didn't muster 1 shot on target all game.

I know in 2014 we had the 7-1 Germany vs Brazil score (which was completely unexpected) but I want to see most of the tournament being fairly competitve. This is supposed to be the finals where the quality should be pretty high. With 48 teams from 2026 the competition could develop into a farce.
 




Exile

Objective but passionate
Aug 10, 2014
2,367
This is why I'm against a 48 team tournament from 2026. 24 teams in the past was perhaps too few, maybe 32 now is just about ok, but in 8 years time with 48 teams even Scotland might qualify!

My biggest fear is the diluting of the tournament if too many teams make it to the finals in the future. We will start to see huge scores in more and more matches, and even though it was great to see a few goals today, ultimately the match was as boring as hell. Saudi Arabia didn't muster 1 shot on target all game.

I know in 2014 we had the 7-1 Germany vs Brazil score (which was completely unexpected) but I want to see most of the tournament being fairly competitve. This is supposed to be the finals where the quality should be pretty high. With 48 teams from 2026 the competition could develop into a farce.

It’s a complete fallacy though, to suggest that 16 more teams = 16 teams worse than the current worst team. Giving Europe 3 more spots (Holland, Italy, Austria?), South America 2 more (Chile, Paraguay?) and CONCACAF 1 more (USA?) is hardly going to introduce 16 Gibraltars.
 


Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Jul 23, 2003
37,342
Up and Coming Sunny Portslade
The Russian players today, written off as hopeless by the entire world beforehand, demonstrated amazing athletism. Each one faster, more powerful, with greater stamina, than their opponents. Almost as if on steroids and amphetamines.

It's a bit like Liverpool, written off as never to be competitive again, reaching the Champions League final by spending 80 minutes of every 90 minute game running around like speed-addled marathon runners and then hanging on.

Meanwhile, Jurgen's prodige gets Huddersfield Town, a team that were overachieving when they were mid-table of the Championship, in to the Premier League and staying up by, erm, closing down like speed addled marathon runners. They must share a fitness coach.
 




Stato

Well-known member
Dec 21, 2011
7,368
The Russian players today, written off as hopeless by the entire world beforehand, demonstrated amazing athletism.

No they didn't. They looked decidedly average and would have lost to any half decent side.

The Saudis never seemed to want to move the ball forward and defended appallingly. The fourth goal was well taken, but the other four were down to defensive errors: defender slipped for the first, two defenders went to ground for the second, centre half lost his man for the third and the keeper left himself too much to do and dived like a wet haddock for the fifth. While all this was going on, we had to listen to Glenn Hoddle going on about what amazing goals they were. There's nothing like the World Cup to remind you how appalling ITV is.
 


portlock seagull

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2003
17,777
I'm obviously alone in believing it's entirely possible Russia bought this game? Let's face it, two v.wealthy countries run by dictators with geopolitical interests they might wish to trade...in a bent tournament...run by a corrupt organisation...involving cultures where bribing is the norm.

Hmmm...A 5-0 opener, the highest in nearly a century, in favour of the hosts who couldn't buy a goal before the tournament. Well, maybe they just did today?
 


seagulls4ever

New member
Oct 2, 2003
4,338
It’s a complete fallacy though, to suggest that 16 more teams = 16 teams worse than the current worst team. Giving Europe 3 more spots (Holland, Italy, Austria?), South America 2 more (Chile, Paraguay?) and CONCACAF 1 more (USA?) is hardly going to introduce 16 Gibraltars.

Concacaf will be getting more than one more:

Africa - 9 (up from 5)
Asia - 8 (up from 4 or 5)
Europe - 16 (up from 13)
North, Central America and Caribbean - 6 (up from 3 or 4)
Oceania - 1 (from 0 or 1)
South America - 6 (up from 4 or 5)

+2 more from some sort of play-off system.

With Asia getting 3/4 more places, and people not being happy about the quality of Saudi Arabia, then I don't think they'll be too pleased about the quality of other Asian teams which weren't able to qualify! Clearly not all the additional teams which enter will be worse than the current worse team, but some of them will be. Certainly the overall average quality of the teams in the tournament will decrease.

But my biggest issue with the 48-team World Cup is not the expansion of teams, but the format which it will take.
 
Last edited:




drew

Drew
NSC Patron
Oct 3, 2006
23,614
Burgess Hill
No they didn't. They looked decidedly average and would have lost to any half decent side.

The Saudis never seemed to want to move the ball forward and defended appallingly. The fourth goal was well taken, but the other four were down to defensive errors: defender slipped for the first, two defenders went to ground for the second, centre half lost his man for the third and the keeper left himself too much to do and dived like a wet haddock for the fifth. While all this was going on, we had to listen to Glenn Hoddle going on about what amazing goals they were. There's nothing like the World Cup to remind you how appalling ITV is.

Not sure many keepers would have kept out the free kick.
 




drew

Drew
NSC Patron
Oct 3, 2006
23,614
Burgess Hill
Concacaf will be getting more than one more:

Africa - 9 (up from 5)
Asia - 8 (up from 4 or 5)
Europe - 16 (up from 13)
North, Central America and Caribbean - 6 (up from 3 or 4)
Oceania - 1 (from 0 or 1)
South America - 6 (up from 4 or 5)

+2 more from some sort of play-off system.

With Asia getting 3/4 more places, and people not being happy about the quality of Saudi Arabia, then I don't think they'll be too pleased about the quality of other Asian teams which weren't able to qualify! Clearly not all the additional teams which enter will be worse than the current worse team, but some of them will be. Certainly the overall average quality of the teams in the tournament will decrease.

But my biggest issue with the 48-team World Cup is not the expansion of teams, but the format which it will take.

Think the proposed format is 16 groups of 3 and top two go through to 32 team knockout round.
 




Weststander

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
69,288
Withdean area
No they didn't. They looked decidedly average and would have lost to any half decent side.

The Saudis never seemed to want to move the ball forward and defended appallingly. The fourth goal was well taken, but the other four were down to defensive errors: defender slipped for the first, two defenders went to ground for the second, centre half lost his man for the third and the keeper left himself too much to do and dived like a wet haddock for the fifth. While all this was going on, we had to listen to Glenn Hoddle going on about what amazing goals they were. There's nothing like the World Cup to remind you how appalling ITV is.

Hoddle's normally a miserable fecker, finding fault. It's as if he decided to reinvent himself as Mr.Positive for this WC, over-praising Russia against Conference level opposition. Perhaps he'll revert to type when England don't live up to his exacting standards.

Agree, ITV and Tyldesley are shite.
 


Kosh

'The' Yaztromo
I'm obviously alone in believing it's entirely possible Russia bought this game? Let's face it, two v.wealthy countries run by dictators with geopolitical interests they might wish to trade...in a bent tournament...run by a corrupt organisation...involving cultures where bribing is the norm.

Hmmm...A 5-0 opener, the highest in nearly a century, in favour of the hosts who couldn't buy a goal before the tournament. Well, maybe they just did today?

Affirmative.

Ball grabbingly obvious. The Saudi keeper took his hands away from at least one goal, dived over another. This game had the look and feel of a scripted ‘performance’ or errrmmm ‘fix.’

I smell something fishy, and i’m not just talking about the contents of the Baltic sea.

This is going to be a hugely suspect WC, mark my words.

That said; it was enjoyable all the same. A smattering of WWE ‘drama’ aside... well as long as the script is engaging, i’ll watch and see who the writers have decided should win. Did i say writers? Whoops! i meant bribers.
 
Last edited:


Weststander

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
69,288
Withdean area
Affirmative.

Ball grabbingly obvious. The Saudi keeper took his hands away from at least one goal, dived over another. This game had the look and feel of a scripted ‘performance’ or errrmmm ‘fix.’

I smell something fishy, and i’m not just talking about the contents of the Baltic sea.

This is going to be a hugely suspect WC, mark my words.

That said; it was enjoyable all the same. A smattering of WWE ‘drama’ aside, well as long as the script is engaging, i’ll watch and see who the writers have decided should win. Did i say writers? Whoops! i meant bribers.

Teams facing Russia will have all the 'bad luck'.
 




TWOCHOICEStom

Well-known member
Sep 22, 2007
10,909
Brighton
I'm obviously alone in believing it's entirely possible Russia bought this game? Let's face it, two v.wealthy countries run by dictators with geopolitical interests they might wish to trade...in a bent tournament...run by a corrupt organisation...involving cultures where bribing is the norm.

Hmmm...A 5-0 opener, the highest in nearly a century, in favour of the hosts who couldn't buy a goal before the tournament. Well, maybe they just did today?

I had exactly the same thought. That first goal would be one of the easiest to throw too. Second ball. Don't mark. Fall over. Dive but don't fully extend.

Watch it back. It looks REALLY weird.
 


Mellotron

I've asked for soup
Jul 2, 2008
32,468
Brighton
I don’t see the correlation (within reason) between quality and enjoyment level.

You can watch two much higher class teams play out a HORRIFICALLY DULL match (Chelsea under Jose anyone?!). At the same time League One/Two can throw up some cracking end to end games.

That was both low standard and really entertaining.
 


PTC Gull

Micky Mouse country.
NSC Patron
Apr 17, 2017
1,295
Florida
No they didn't. They looked decidedly average and would have lost to any half decent side.

The Saudis never seemed to want to move the ball forward and defended appallingly. The fourth goal was well taken, but the other four were down to defensive errors: defender slipped for the first, two defenders went to ground for the second, centre half lost his man for the third and the keeper left himself too much to do and dived like a wet haddock for the fifth. While all this was going on, we had to listen to Glenn Hoddle going on about what amazing goals they were. There's nothing like the World Cup to remind you how appalling ITV is.

Marvelous use of a fish reference outside of the "ahem" other thread. :clap2:
 






atfc village

Well-known member
Mar 28, 2013
5,080
Lower Bourne .Farnham
It took Hoddle 38 seconds to say it's good too see the host nation do well in a tournament.Russia surely through now ,the longer they stay in the more decisions will go their way.
 


jackalbion

Well-known member
Aug 30, 2011
4,919
First, I don't think it was as bad as you're making it sound. Couple of quality goals at the end there.

Second, yes it instantly becomes more enjoyable because it's the World Cup. You can see how much it means to each team, the effort and intensity they put in, when they might not have the quality. There's only three games in the group stage - and so each one becomes immensely important. Just like cup finals, title deciders, etc are instantly more enjoyable games of football because of what they mean - even if the games themselves are dull 1-0 results. I've seen far worse quality in the lower divisions of English football and still enjoyed it.

It's interesting to see the styles of different teams from around the world. You could see Saudi Arabia were trying to play passing, technical football - but they didn't have the quality to get past Russia, who will have surprised everyone with that performance, in their own country. The atmosphere was great.

It was the two lowest ranked teams in the tournament, but I was entertained. You could improve the quality of the World Cup by cutting the teams and restricting it to just the European and South American teams, but I think that would be a bit shit really.

Maybe you're just not that into football?

I found the commitment to passing football entertaining and quite amusing. Their commitment to it was dumbfounded, despite it leading the conceding of 3 goals at one point they continued to try and play out of every situation. One of the most entertaining, amusing and frustrating teams I’ve ever watched.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here