Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
It is an assault under common law.
No it isn't.
To be an assault there has to be some physical contact even if it's pouring a pint of beer over his head.
It is an assault under common law.
No it isn't.
To be an assault there has to be some physical contact even if it's pouring a pint of beer over his head.
To be an assault there has to be some physical contact even if it's pouring a pint of beer over his head.
You are both wrong.
No there doesn't. An assault is putting somebody in fear, battery is physical contact. I could phone you up and say I was going to kill you, if you were genuinely scared I am, that is an assault.
Care to elaborate? As far as I understand under common law an assault requires no physical contact yet a battery does? Obviously more serious assaults under the OAPA will require contact.
That is threatening behaviour. Assault under common law is attacking someone from the front. battery is attacking someone from behind.
You are closer. My simple response was because I did not want to be dragged in! The victim must fear immediate unlawful violence. Merely threatening is not enough for assault. For example, that telephone example above by another poster is not necessarily correct, although if 'I am outside' was added, it would be.
Edit: a better example would be throwing a rock at someone but missing.
Christ, feels like an A-level law lesson in here
Christ, feels like an A-level law lesson in here
Pipe down or I'll go all s20 on you
That is threatening behaviour. Assault under common law is attacking someone from the front. battery is attacking someone from behind.
I love the complete lack of understanding in criminal law portrayed here. Quite comical.