Don't twist the conversation to Barnes (again) so you can go off on one (again)... actually, as I stated on the Barnes thread, yes, I believe Barnes is a far better player than Wood... his positional sense is light years ahead of Wood... he is also better technically (with his feet)... also, he is far more mobile... oh, and I'm not apologising for seeing things through BHAFC-tinted glasses either...
Where am I twisting the conversation. You also suggest the reason I'm anti Barnes is because I don't like him, even though because of idiots making comments like that, I have said time and time again I don't dislike him. I've nothing against him, other than I don't rate him.Don't twist the conversation to Barnes (again) so you can go off on one (again)... actually, as I stated on the Barnes thread, yes, I believe Barnes is a far better player than Wood... his positional sense is light years ahead of Wood... he is also better technically (with his feet)... also, he is far more mobile... oh, and I'm not apologising for seeing things through BHAFC-tinted glasses either...
You said Wood was Utter Utter Gash. How I am twisting what you said?Do you have a VENDETTA against Barnes? Do you have selective memory? BTW I wouldn't swap Barnes for Wood... I know Wood is still young, but on the evidence of what I have seen, he is utter, utter gash...
They loaned him out to a League 1 side so he could play some first team football to help with his development (footballers don't all come ready-made as global superstars as soon as they become adults).
Clearly they think he has the potential (that means that he is not the finished article yet, but he has the talent, and with ongoing coaching and development he may be able to grown into a player good enough to play in the Premier League).
Do you understand that or do you think that they should just sack him as if he hasn't made it yet at the ripe old age of 19 then he never will?
When Arsenal loaned Jack Wilshere to Bolton, did they do that because they didn't think he could make it at the top level of the Premier League? Or did they do it because he wasn't ready to hold down a regular starting place at the top level of the league, so they wanted him to play first team football for a lower team to help him develop into a player who could handle it at a top team?
I cant actually believe I'm still trying to explain this, I'm sure 99% of every one else on this thread understands.
Have you ever asked him how good he thinks he is? How do you know all this?
I disagree. He could easily get to the level required to play for a bottom third Premier League club within the next few years.
It depends what you mean by EPL standard. Starting 11, nowhere near. Subs bench as a promising youngster who you can bring on as a sub when comfortable and develop to be a starting EPL player in a couple of years - quite possibly. And I assume that is what he is aiming for.
OK... I hope his dreams come true with West Brom then...
No chance there may have been a c, d or e then. Only two choices. That must suggest A] You know the exact reason why, or B] you're a complete knob. And I don't think we need a c,d, or e on this one. I'm going for b
I agree with you that Barnes is currently a better player. However, when Barnes was Woods' age he was also rubbish in the Championship and was written off by a lot of Argyle fans, and subsequently sent on loan to a League One club. We saw his potential, signed him on a permanent and he got 20 goals for us.
Played at the World Cup for NZ... not fcuking Brazil...
And this is the same management team that signed Liam Dickinson, and got sacked?? I'd say thats a f***ing plus, if those muppets don't rate you? OKHow pleasant of you, Mr B... his contract was terminated at Barnsley because he was not deemed good enough by their management team... OK?
Ask yourself this Wood fans... why did Barnsley of the Championship cancel his loan last season (which is why he ended up with us in L1)?
Is it because:
(a) he is ready for the Championship, but they don't like Kiwi's?
(b) he isn't ready and thinks he is better than he is?
I'm going for (b)...
Where am I twisting the conversation. You also suggest the reason I'm anti Barnes is because I don't like him, even though because of idiots making comments like that, I have said time and time again I don't dislike him. I've nothing against him, other than I don't rate him.
You said Wood was Utter Utter Gash. How I am twisting what you said?
I would say its you with a vendetta, a vendetta against Wood. He's utter utter Gash. Nice summing up. Good argument?
Wood and Barnes have similar records. I doubt Wood missed nearly as many sitters as Barnes next season. If neither were our player, and I had to pick one, I'd pick WOod every day. I don't think he'll be good enough in the long run, but in my opinion he's got a lot better chance of "making it" as Barnes.
There is certainly not a major gulf between them as you try and paint out, but then as I say, you see everything through blue and white specs, as you almost admitted, so that proves you cannot have a fair opinion on players.
So you'd rather that he makes it as a Premier League player with West Brom than potentially with us, warranting a large transfer fee if we sold him?
Eh!? How did you get to that conclusion?