Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[News] Wood burners



Superphil

Dismember
Jul 7, 2003
25,754
In a pile of football shirts
I've got one, but in recent years stopped using it when winds fall light and always run it hot.

If you get a decent one they are quite efficient, open fires far less so. Look pretty but close to useless for generating heat.
You say that, but when we light ours we are able to shut off both radiators and the log fire heats the entire room pretty well. It's not a small room, and it's not a very big fire, but does a lovely job of warming us up and looking lovely.
 




Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Jul 23, 2003
38,100
Up and Coming Sunny Portslade
Do quick google for news featuring wood burners. Get back links, up in arms, from the Mail, Express and GB News, one of which features Brighton Council.

Certainly checks out.
 




Hastings gull

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2013
4,661
You say that, but when we light ours we are able to shut off both radiators and the log fire heats the entire room pretty well. It's not a small room, and it's not a very big fire, but does a lovely job of warming us up and looking lovely.
Yes, ours is really good and heats up the large room and beyond really well. We have the efficient and eco-friendly (as far as possible) version, according to the chap who fitted it. We are in the country -there is no gas -and like many others in the village rely on our log burner. We only burn dried wood and not any old crap, which might adversely affect the clean air readings.
 








abc

Well-known member
Jan 6, 2007
1,444
Apparently but if that’s the most deadly form of pollution…. and woodburners create more of it than “All the UK’s road traffic” ????? Then I am (some on here will pleased to know) speechless.

Indeed. It’s the same train of thought with cows etc - bovines have been around forever and the methane cycle means that the emmision concerns are greatly exaggerated. The real climate change baddies are cars, lorries and air travel which if not addressed make every other measure pretty pointless. But properly dealing with transport issues will be massively unpopular and have significant economic ramifications. Thus politicians ignore them and go for the easy wins and headlines.
 


Bodian

Well-known member
May 3, 2012
15,060
Cumbria
The Guardian have been running stories on this for a few years now. Which I find a little hypocritical, given that I would guess that quite a few of their journalists will have log-stoves - it's very much their sort of thing. I also recently read one of their 'cosy country pubs' (or similar) articles - quite a decent number of them were accompanied by mentions of the 'toasty open fire', sitting with a drink on a cold day by the 'roaring wood-burner'. And so on.
 




MJsGhost

Oooh Matron, I'm an
NSC Patron
Jun 26, 2009
5,103
East
Apparently but if that’s the most deadly form of pollution…. and woodburners create more of it than “All the UK’s road traffic” ????? Then I am (some on here will pleased to know) speechless.

Yes it sounds implausible woodburners cause more pollution than cars

But that they produce more of one dangerous particulate? i could believe that.
I looked into this when we were expecting our first child about 4 years ago - domestic wood burning is a significant source of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) emissions. For that reason, we've only used the wood burner a handful of times since (though with no mains gas, our CH is oil-fired, so still not ideal)

I found some more recent numbers:
According to Defra, domestic combustion contributed an estimated 29% of total PM2.5 emissions in 2022, with most emissions coming from households using wood-burning stoves or open fireplaces.

The transport sector, including all forms of domestic transport, accounted for 22% of PM2.5 emissions in the same year.

TL/DR?
As @Nobby Cybergoat suggests, it's a specific particle (which happens to be very dangerous) rather than pollution in general that is being compared. In 2022, 29% of the UK's total PM2.5 emissions were produced by domestic burning of wood for heat, compared to 22% by vehicles.
 


schmunk

Well-used member
Jan 19, 2018
10,647
Mid mid mid Sussex
My original point is that I simply don’t believe that woodburners create more pollution than “All the UK’s road traffic”

Your points are valid and the world is changing but I am suspicious of anything that is put higher up the list than traffic really
Your woodburner doesn't have a catalytic converter...
 






nicko31

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2010
18,834
Gods country fortnightly
You say that, but when we light ours we are able to shut off both radiators and the log fire heats the entire room pretty well. It's not a small room, and it's not a very big fire, but does a lovely job of warming us up and looking lovely.
I don't doubt this, but there is little control over the burn and 75% of the heat goes up the chimney. With most woodburners 75% stays in the room
 


Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
63,524
The Fatherland
Underfloor heating is the way to go.
 


Rdodge30

Well-known member
Dec 30, 2022
927
I don't doubt this, but there is little control over the burn and 75% of the heat goes up the chimney. With most woodburners 75% stays in the room

We used to squat an old house that had a damper in the chimney, you pulled it forward with the hook on the end of the poker and it heated a back boiler. That was back in the 80’s though and the house was old then. I managed to get my pot belly stove up the stairs into an upstairs bedroom, took a pane of glass out the window and replaced it with a board with a hole in and had a bit of flexi pipe on top of the stove pipe going out through the hole! The ‘s bend’ in the flexi pipe meant it didn’t half draw !!
 








Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
63,524
The Fatherland
Off a heat pump, should be the future for new builds
Takes a while to get the hang of temperature wise, but once you have had it there’s no going back.
 


schmunk

Well-used member
Jan 19, 2018
10,647
Mid mid mid Sussex
Indeed. It’s the same train of thought with cows etc - bovines have been around forever and the methane cycle means that the emmision concerns are greatly exaggerated. The real climate change baddies are cars, lorries and air travel which if not addressed make every other measure pretty pointless. But properly dealing with transport issues will be massively unpopular and have significant economic ramifications. Thus politicians ignore them and go for the easy wins and headlines.
You're comparing the global warming effects of various polluters whereas the main concern with log burners is the public health effects.

A field of tobacco burning in China is going to cause lots more pollution than a box of tobacco sticks burned one by one in your mouth, but the latter is more individually concerning.
 




Rdodge30

Well-known member
Dec 30, 2022
927
I miss those days on site, dried ferns and birch twigs, split ash. I was only telling junior the other day about my fire lighter - a small block of magnesium with a long flint along the top with a small piece of hacksaw blade attached with string.
 


Sorrel

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
3,010
Back in East Sussex
New neighbour put one in and it stinks our place out. Can’t open the windows for smoke billowing in. 😡
Modern wood burners have to meet emission guidelines; they don’t emit much smoke at all. What route does the smoke take to reach your window? Maybe it isn’t a log-burner?

All the “findings” against them assume people have older/more polluting burners, not modern ones.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here