I don't get what gets people's goat with get. It's what the experts call a delexicalised verb. We use it in all manner of ways so to say it doesn't make sense in the phrase "can I get", makes no sense imo.
It is wrong in the way it is used. If ordering a coffee, of someone says, 'Can I get a latte?' the correct answer would be, 'No you can't, but I can go and get one for you.'I don't get what gets people's goat with get. It's what the experts call a delexicalised verb. We use it in all manner of ways so to say it doesn't make sense in the phrase "can I get", makes no sense imo.
If its at Old Trafford it's usually the rain
I’m not sure this post makes sense, sorry I’ve read it 4 times and not actually sure what you are saying.
It is wrong in the way it is used. If ordering a coffee, of someone says, 'Can I get a latte?' the correct answer would be, 'No you can't, but I can go and get one for you.'
'Can I get' would be correct in the context of 'Can I go and get myself a cup of coffee?' - but using it to order a coffee is nonsense, because when ordering you are actually asking someone else to go and get you a cup of coffee.
When a ‘geezer’ tele salesman calls you mate.
Maybe it’s an age thing, but I always pull them up on it immediately, “I’m 56, we’ve spoken for barely a couple of minutes, so clearly you are not my mate!” ��
........... to claim "can I get..." is linguistically illogical seems a bit futile.
Except that it is illogical - and incorrect.
The one that I seem to be alone in is 'choice' vs 'option', ie., "You've got two choices, a or b".
No. You've got ONE CHOICE. You have TWO OPTIONS.
Yes, we know.But why? Get is not merely a synonym of fetch.
It's called grammar. Try some authoritative sources -Who decides what is incorrect?
Well, if we want to get all Schroedinger's cat...Wrong! You also have Hobson’s choice