[Albion] Will you be shitting it...

[Cheeky Monkey]

Win or lose I shall be pretty zen about the whole thing.

If there's a more aloof gatekeeper this side of Chipping Sodbury I've yet to see him post anything on here!

 

[AmexRuislip]

If you were Stoke or Southampton would you prefer our position or theirs?

Obviously, it's just annoying that we had an opportunity today for a possible three points

 

[Is it PotG?]

Obviously, it's just annoying that we had an opportunity today for a possible three points

Saints might say the same v a dire West Ham.

 

[rocker959]

No .

 

[Dave the OAP]

After today's results, and tomorrow where stoke get dicked, i am actually very confident tat we only need three more points.

So that is three vs Huddersfield ....however I think we will get point at palace and one at home vs Spurs and manu.

Panic thee not

 

[Saunders]

Obviously, it's just annoying that we had an opportunity today for a possible three points

I am still seething that it looked like an easy win for them but no I am not "shitting it" because another game has been used up and our rivals didnt gain anything.

 

[afcb]

No chance you will go down

Have you seen Southamptons run in

Roll on 28th April

 

[daveinprague]

Think we are fairly safe on 34 with the other teams fixtures. Doubt if WBA will catch Stoke, never mind anybody else. Saints fixtures, horrible. Stokes, just as bad.

 

[A1X]

I may be controversial here, but I wonder whether when the season ends it may turn out 34 points would be enough (even if on Goal Difference), even if we didn't know it at the time. Similar to how it turned out the game last season which got us promoted was actually the win at QPR, nobody bar Newcastle overtook our points total after that game.

But if we do lose next week then I think we'll be very, very uncomfortable. It won't be an outright calamity, but it'll be pretty bad and mean we have to get the points we could have got from today and next week in the away games at Palace and Burnley. Which are tough to start with.

 

[LlcoolJ]

Saints might say the same v a dire West Ham.

Eh? Saints were DESTROYED by a poor West Ham team. The commentators on 5 live were scathing about how utterly terrible and not up for the fight the Saints players were.

We were excellent today and but for the rub of the green would have beaten a very good Leicester side.

I don't see the similarity.

 

[CorgiRegisteredFriend]

Imodium says no!

 

[Is it PotG?]

Eh? Saints were DESTROYED by a poor West Ham team. The commentators on 5 live were scathing about how utterly terrible and not up for the fight the Saints players were.

We were excellent today and but for the rub of the green would have beaten a very good Leicester side.

I don't see the similarity.

We both got nil points. Both started thinking we might get something. We were not excellent. Shots on target? A more or less level win/draw/loss record shows how good Leicester are.

 

[LlcoolJ]

I may be controversial here, but I wonder whether when the season ends it may turn out 34 points would be enough (even if on Goal Difference), even if we didn't know it at the time. Similar to how it turned out the game last season which got us promoted was actually the win at QPR, nobody bar Newcastle overtook our points total after that game.

But if we do lose next week then I think we'll be very, very uncomfortable. It won't be an outright calamity, but it'll be pretty bad and mean we have to get the points we could have got from today and next week in the away games at Palace and Burnley. Which are tough to start with.

It's not controversial. I'm not counting chickens whatsoever but I really can't see where Stoke or Southampton are going to get the points to reach 34.

 

[Wozza]

✓✓✓

 

[The Camel]

I may be controversial here, but I wonder whether when the season ends it may turn out 34 points would be enough (even if on Goal Difference), even if we didn't know it at the time. Similar to how it turned out the game last season which got us promoted was actually the win at QPR, nobody bar Newcastle overtook our points total after that game.

But if we do lose next week then I think we'll be very, very uncomfortable. It won't be an outright calamity, but it'll be pretty bad and mean we have to get the points we could have got from today and next week in the away games at Palace and Burnley. Which are tough to start with.

I said a month ago 35 points would probably be enough. I'm sticking with this.

Why would teams who have averaged less than 1 point per game this far, suddenly improve to 1.5, let alone 2 points per game?

Maybe 1 or 2 teams will do better, but there are so many bad teams down there, not all will. Indeed some will do worse than have so far. 34 could well be enough.

 

[crookie]

If we lose next weekend we're down IMO, can't see us getting anything after next weekend so a win is a must and 37 will have to be enough.

This

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

 

[hans kraay fan club]

We both got nil points. Both started thinking we might get something. We were not excellent. Shots on target? A more or less level win/draw/loss record shows how good Leicester are.

Not sure how many, but Schmeichel made three pretty good saves, from the penalty, Groß’ long shot, and March’s free kick.

 

[Is it PotG?]

Not sure how many, but Schmeichel made three pretty good saves, from the penalty, Groß’ long shot, and March’s free kick.

Do you think we deserved to win? Genuine question.

 

[LlcoolJ]

We both got nil points. Both started thinking we might get something. We were not excellent. Shots on target? A more or less level win/draw/loss record shows how good Leicester are.

Bollocks mate. Being extremely unfortunate not to at least draw against Leicester is in no way comparable to being dry humped by West Ham.

Southampton are in the mire, maybe it's just you as every other fan/pundit/ex player etc seems to think so.

 

[hans kraay fan club]

Do you think we deserved to win? Genuine question.

I believe that had Murray scored the penalty, then we would have won.