sussex_guy2k2
Well-known member
- Jun 6, 2014
- 4,080
I'd certainly consider rotating the squad through those games and I think Hughton will do so. I don't think the core will change all that much though.
Some have played two additional matches in each of those international 'breaks', though!
(Ryan, Duffy, Hemed, Propper)
No chance. If a rotated squad got spanked 5-0, it would set squad morale back massively. It's not a risk worth taking, especially as Man Utd are not what they were. It's not beyond the realms of possibility that we could get something from that one anyway. Of the big six teams, I believe Man Utd is the team we are most likely to get anything from, especially if they underestimate us.
Why the hell would we rest players?
Jose is renowned for playing very defensive football away, we could come out with points. Why would we just roll over and admit defeat by benching our best players? We held city to 2-0 when we weren't fully firing, we can give any team a good go at the Amex.
EDIT: forgot its at Old Trafford but my point still stands. don't show respect to these big teams. stick it to em
To add, City only scored 1 goal - if we omit Dunk's own goal. I really think this is a game we could get a result. I'd take a draw, but I reckon winning isn't impossible.We held city to 2-0 when we weren't fully firing, we can give any team a good go at the Amex.
No chance. If a rotated squad got spanked 5-0, it would set squad morale back massively. It's not a risk worth taking, especially as Man Utd are not what they were. It's not beyond the realms of possibility that we could get something from that one anyway. Of the big six teams, I believe Man Utd is the team we are most likely to get anything from, especially if they underestimate us.
Wait until we are 5:0 down before making the changes.
In reality surely this game is as big for the players as it is for the supporters. To play at OT must be quite something. Would you want to take that away from our hard working players? Who is going to tell Knocky 'sorry mate, you're dropped'?
You've also got to take into account what players want and their personal aspirations. Yes, team comes first, but someone who is playing their heart out every game is hardly going to want to be rested for a big game at Old Trafford on the argument we won't get anything.
Play your best available team in every game. We have a squad to use, but use it at Old Trafford to get something, don't use it because you don't think you will.
It isn't that simple though. As [MENTION=6886]Bozza[/MENTION] says, the next run of games is 11 matches in just 40something days. There is no way in the world that Bruno and Murray will manage all of them. Hughton has to decide whether to let them run themselves into the ground, and THEN have to rest them, or manage them through it with rotation.
With Murray it can be done in-game, of course. Try to get him playing every match, but bring him off when possible, to protect his fitness. He wouldn't want to do that with a defender.
Propper and Stephens are the toughest ones. Their pairing is crucial to how we are doing, but the effort asked of them every game is a concern, IMO. A fully firing Beram Kayal to come on for either / or at 60 minutes of a few games would be a huge help.
Now if GM scores a couple off his arse v Stoke, would that swap still be playing a 'weakened' team?
Not so sure about 2.I can see your thinking but
1) The first team players deserve to play at OT.
2) Whilst were doing well, they won’t be feeling tired or feeling in need of a rest.
crikey I think Watford,palace,stoke have shown if you run at city they totally destroy you on the break, they are in awesome form however someone has to beat them ? surelyTo add, City only scored 1 goal - if we omit Dunk's own goal. I really think this is a game we could get a result. I'd take a draw, but I reckon winning isn't impossible.