Wardy's twin
Well-known member
- Oct 21, 2014
- 8,874
If you want to compare seat-belt laws with injecting stuff into someone’s body, then anything else you say is irrelevant. Words fail me.
Its not just words that fail you....
You know full well that the seat belt example was part of an argument that says we should comply to laws which are generally seen to improve society and that individuals need to compromise. In this case seatbelts protected the individual, reduced serious hospitalisation AND stopped ambulance people having to pick up the bits. Yet at the time people still felt it was their choice, same with drink driving. Its about compliance , and the best example of this with vaccination was societies compliance with BCG injections which helped eliminate TB as a major killer.