Machiavelli
Well-known member
Financial Times Editorial yesterday (not in full):
The foundation of this UK government is a bunker of close allies surrounded by a lightweight, supine and largely ineffectual cabinet chosen mainly for their commitment to Brexit or their loyalty to Mr Johnson in last year’s Conservative party leadership contest. With the possible exception of Rishi Sunak, the chancellor, and Michael Gove, the cabinet office minister, few show the gravity demanded of a secretary of state. More heavyweight conservatives are meanwhile banished to the back benches.
They have their analysis spot on there. It's only Sunak and Gove that have demonstrated any intellect. Gove gets rolled out in situations such as this when things get really desperate, or a case needs to be made, because he's the Cabinet's most skilled, detailed and effective communicator, but the extent to which he's aligned with the Johnson/Cummings/Brexit project and takeover of the Tory Party is blindingly obvious. Most agree that, so far, Sunak has got things right, and he's also shown himself to be a lithe, skilled communicator. His problem -- or opportunity -- will come when he formulates policies to extract us from lockdown and depression. I suspect that the depth of the problems are too stark, and that he'll probably get unfairly blamed, but that's politics unfortunately. The Tories have gone relentlessly after Brown for 'crashing the economy', and chickens will no doubt be coming home to roost for a decade of that particular mantra.