Grombleton
Surrounded by <div>s
- Dec 31, 2011
- 7,356
People actually voted for this spineless, worthless, pointless waste of skin.
They actually voted for him.
They actually voted for him.
But that’s now how you come across. Cummings is totally out of order but as he Brexit you seem ok with it. Does co e across well.
WAFU, D190.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Shameful performance by the PM there - but be careful what you wish for. Do you really want Gove or Raab in charge?
Boris says what Cummings did was legal. I don’t get that.
Wasn’t it illegal? As there wasnt an immediate life threat.
I mean, you can sympathise With Cummings if you like, but isn’t it clear that what he did was illegal?
Boris wouldnt say it was legal unless he had grounds to say it. He’s not Thick, despite what some say.
I’m not sniping. I just don’t get it.
People actually voted for this spineless, worthless, pointless waste of skin.
They actually voted for him.
Shameful performance by the PM there - but be careful what you wish for. Do you really want Gove or Raab in charge?
This is where the Tory’s ambiguous lockdown laws pay for themselves.
Yes, what did happen to the Russia Interference report ?Russia and Brexit
Quite right. So what was wrong with the Aunty and Uncle who live in London? Mary’s brother and sister, for clarification.
He didn't leave 'his kids' with anybody, even though his wife (who was supposedly already infected) wrote "Dom spent 10 days bedridden after 'collapsing' and having 'spasms' with the disease at the end of March" in her column in The Spectator. If this was true, this happened within 4 days of them travelling to 'get support from the family'. So given they were both 'struck down' and suffering badly, why wouldn't they have got the family to look after their child, as this was the sole reason for travelling ?
Because they didn't do what they said they were going to Durham for, instead they have since stated that the only help from the family was 'His sister shopped for the family and left everything outside.'
This is what has been published
23 March: The prime minister tells the UK public they "must stay at home". People are warned not to meet friends or family members they do not live with. Those with symptoms had already been told to self-isolate
27 March: Mr Cummings is seen leaving No 10 Downing Street
30 March: No 10 says Mr Cummings is self-isolating with coronavirus symptoms
31 March: Police in Durham are "made aware of reports that an individual had travelled from London to Durham and was present at an address in the city". Officers "made contact with the owners of that address". Cummings has since stated "At no stage was he or his family spoken to by the police about this matter, as is being reported".
12 April: Mr Cummings visited Barnard Castle, 30 miles from his parents' home in Durham, according to The Observer and Mirror newspapers. On Sunday, Transport Secretary Grant Shapps said he understands Mr Cummings would have been out of quarantine period at this point
14 April: Mr Cummings was photographed at Downing Street for the first time since 27 March
19 April: Five days after being in London, Mr Cummings was seen again in Durham by an unnamed witness, The Observer and Mirror reported on Sunday. Downing Street says this is "false"
If any of this is incorrect then Cummings will have his lawyers onto the papers that printed them quicker than a tramp on chips. (Maybe it's the bank holiday weekend causing the delay, as I don't think lawyers work weekends do they )
And although it's very good of you to come out and tell us that 'I am happy with his initial incident', it appears that breaking the lockdown rules isn't something that is subject to your approval. 'Mouldy Boots' said it was OK with him, isn't apparently, a great legal defence
If you're happy with the initial incident, then you didn't believe in the lockdown guidelines, and if you didn't believe in them, why are you fussed about evidence for the second incident?
It is OK to not believe in the need for the lockdown, I will happily debate that, but I don't understand why you aren't making that the crux of your argument?
Maybe Sunak? If not another election.
Whatever happens, I've lost all respect for BJ, and It won't be back anytime soon.
I am concerned you actually know Cummings relatives names.
There could be many reasons, they have underlying health conditions, he may have had sex with his sister-in-law while on lockdown, so many reasons.
Making stuff up is so easy, I might start a new paper called the 'fantasist', there is obviously a market for shite press that the gullible will read and believe.
So basically after seeing our loved PM, there is nothing to see.
Just back it up with cast-iron facts and you might get some credibility Watford, and that goes to the others that hang on your prolonged nipples feeding off your sour cream.
Because I understand incident 1, but if there were other incidents I would need to know why and if they didn't fit the lockdown profile he would have been in trouble and I would back the removal, but these have not appeared from the mystery person claiming them.
Nothing to see.
Let's move on and tackle the COVID 19 and not wet pants over Cummings.