You're changing your story now. First of all it was that the players, by and large, are not good enough to play football at this level. In your last post you have completely changed and are saying that their performances have not been good enough.
Which of these, in general, do you think is the crux of the issue...
1. The players are not good enough.
2. The players are good enough, but their performances have not been good enough.
Because if it is 1, I stand by all I said - you're attacks are vicious and unnecessary. These blokes are doing a job, have been given instruction and do their best by that.
Of course, if you believe the issue is 2 then it invalidates pretty much everything you've said.
Which of these, in general, do you think is the crux of the issue...
1. The players are not good enough.
2. The players are good enough, but their performances have not been good enough.
Because if it is 1, I stand by all I said - you're attacks are vicious and unnecessary. These blokes are doing a job, have been given instruction and do their best by that.
Of course, if you believe the issue is 2 then it invalidates pretty much everything you've said.