This isn't something that's been introduced for this game. We have been playing with 2 DM's for months now. It's clearly a negative way to play unless you have the legs in there to support the front players when we break.
*Sigh* So for the entire season we moan because we don't play Ince and Holla together, now we moan because we do?
our inability to get bodies in number into the box at any time is shocking - there was one occasion yesterday when we broke and the ball was crossed into the box to the one (yes one as usual!) person in the box - the rest of our midfield and attackers hadn't got past the halfway line and were jogging.
At last---- someone who may agree with my Holla thread
our inability to get bodies in number into the box at any time is shocking - there was one occasion yesterday when we broke and the ball was crossed into the box to the one (yes one as usual!) person in the box - the rest of our midfield and attackers hadn't got past the halfway line and were jogging.
steady on now.......
Our midfield apart from Ince is simply woeful - JFC offers nothing and even when pushed on yesterday he was very poor- Holla very slow and ponderous but better than Jfc, as it stands we're going to struggle to stay up with our midfield and our even worse forward lineOnly Ince is anywhere near good enough out of the midfielders who were out there yesterday.All the better options are currently injured or on the bench.Colunga and Tex played really well at Fulham and offer so much more.Hopefully we can add a decent one as well this month,i have never known midfielders to offer so little as Holla and Caskey do.
our inability to get bodies in number into the box at any time is shocking - there was one occasion yesterday when we broke and the ball was crossed into the box to the one (yes one as usual!) person in the box - the rest of our midfield and attackers hadn't got past the halfway line and were jogging.
Playing 2 DMs is necessary when there are many others lacking elsewhere in the team it simple covers our lack of ability and pace throughout the team when defending.
It's not as if playing two DMs is that unusual, is it? Many teams now line up in a 4-2-3-1 formation - including some very good ones!
True - and they have better players than us too. The point I'm trying to make is that I don't see anything wrong, or odd, about using the 4-2-3-1 formation.The difference is that those teams you mention have players who are up and down the pitch for 90 with pace.
True - and they have better players than us too. The point I'm trying to make is that I don't see anything wrong, or odd, about using the 4-2-3-1 formation.
Yh agreed, nothing wrong with any formation, any style, but, it should suit the type of players you have, not the other way around.