graphic insulting discriptions of the act of Gay male sex.
Can I ask what is 'insulting' about a description of gay male sex?
graphic insulting discriptions of the act of Gay male sex.
Can I ask what is 'insulting' about a description of gay male sex?
i put gay insults in around the same area as insults about a girl being easy, someone being ginger or fat, their mother being a slag, their national location meaning they are likly to be unemployed, welsh or scottish. ie they dont really matter its usually without real malice and does anyone really take any notice? aside from sodomy (which is still illegal hetrosexually) i dont recall there were ever laws against being gay, or them being excluded from anything or going anywhere (though easier to keep it to yourself obviously). unlike being black, where you had slavery and distinct laws (well, abroad any way, not sure that ever applied here) and legalised or accepted segregation.
maybe we should turn it on its head, why is racism special, when you can abuse some one for just about anyother reason? (except in the work place, then *nothing* is allowed...)
How would you prove that either "We can see you holding hands" or "Does your boyfriend know you're here?" were intended as gay taunts?
Is holding hands the exclusive preserve of the gay community? Do none of the LADIES in the ground have boyfriends?....
oh come on, the taunts were intended as nothing more than abuse and incitement. Lets not pretend they were meant as anything else.
Being intended as abuse, and taking them as abuse are two different things.
Some xenophobic, jingoistic airhead on here calls me fat boy. He's meaning it as an insult - bless him - but it can't really be one if it's true. I am rather (too) portly, you know.
So, the question still stands - what is 'insulting' about a description of gay male sex?
I see the agenda now is to turn it around on its head and make out the West Hams meant it as a compliment. Ok, you think that but the chants were highly offensive to either hetero's or gays I would have thought but hey, I am just voicing an opinion, if people think it is acceptable and that it doesn't matter, its a free World.
I've already posted a few times what was said Alan so whats the point in posting it again ?. Anyway I've had my say, thanks for listening and have a good night.
Actually, I don't give up.
I know what was said. But you're dodging the question. It's not what was said that bothered you, was it? Or rather, it shouldn't have been. It's the way it was said...
That could be quite good. Picture the scene:¤DãŃn¥ §êãGüLL¤;4475697 said:Doesn't bother me in the slightest but I always wonder that because there's a good chance there may well be gay fans in the away end, how they'd feel if they knew they were sitting next to someone of that orientation when dishing out homophobic abuse.
¤DãŃn¥ §êãGüLL¤;4475697 said:Doesn't bother me in the slightest but I always wonder that because there's a good chance there may well be gay fans in the away end, how they'd feel if they knew they were sitting next to someone of that orientation when dishing out homophobic abuse.
They don't all mince around with handbags you know Dougal. Some of them look like normal people.Cant be many opposing gay away fans surely.
Must be a few Brighton gay fans due to the large gay population in Brighton. Not sure would be the case elsewhere although bound to be a few. Doesnt seem to be many if any gay players mind
Some peoples views are naive in the extreme.
Brighton mentality is a different mentality to most, sometimes a good thing, sometimes a bad thing
Cant be many opposing gay away fans surely.
Must be a few Brighton gay fans due to the large gay population in Brighton. Not sure would be the case elsewhere although bound to be a few. Doesnt seem to be many if any gay players mind
Some peoples views are naive in the extreme.
Brighton mentality is a different mentality to most, sometimes a good thing, sometimes a bad thing
There will be more then a few gay away fans in the away end at anyone time, by average there should be about 156 (one in 16) for a capacity away crowd, does that scare you?