Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Why has nobody been to the MOON lately ?



pishhead

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2003
5,248
Everywhere
kind of a serious question what is to stop some company manufacturing a huge huge sign/banner and putting it on the moon?
 




Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
kind of a serious question what is to stop some company manufacturing a huge huge sign/banner and putting it on the moon?

Kind of serious follow up question, how big would it have to be to be seen from Earth??
 






Brovion

In my defence, I was left unsupervised.
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
20,055
Why haven't we been lately? Get with the programme Easy, man is yet to set foot on the MOON.
The one thing the conspiracy theorists have never been able to answer was that IF the moon landing in 1969 was successfully faked - why did they fake it again? And again? And again? And again? And again? Surely once would have been enough? And how much of it was faked? Did the astronauts actually never take off? And if the take-off was real how did they fake the source of the radio transmissions and the physically-observable path of the rocket to the moon? (To say nothing of the return)

The Yanks must have picked up some seriously-good technology from the ailens at Roswell in order to have fooled the entire world - six times! And paid the Russians a fortune to stay quiet.
 






Mar 13, 2008
1,101
theres not enough interest scientfically (never was really for manned exploration) and its still too expensive for any sort of commercial activity.

or, you can go conspiracy and say it proves no one went there in the first place, ignoring the witnesses, rocks gathered and f***ing tracks that can be seen on Google Moon.

Witnesses of what exactly? Surely the only witnesses are the astronauts.
 








Herr Tubthumper

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 11, 2003
63,668
The Fatherland
kind of a serious question what is to stop some company manufacturing a huge huge sign/banner and putting it on the moon?

The cost?
 






Lady Whistledown

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
47,855
I agree, Easy.

I can remember the Tomorrow's World programmes of my youth, where the presenters earnestly forecast that by 2010 we'd all be flying to work in our own personal spaceships, wearing outfits made for some unfathomable reason of shiny metallic material, and colonising the Moon.

Why did all future prediction shows of the 80s insist we'd be wearing shiny metal clothes?
 




skipper734

Registered ruffian
Aug 9, 2008
9,189
Curdridge
Cause if they told us ,Albion supporters would be proudly wearing pink striped shirts to matches, nobody would have believed them! :thumbsup:
 






We should have had some kind of MOONBASE there by now, surely.
If I was watching that first lunar landing back in 1969 (I wasn't, because I was -2), and someone had said to me that very day that there'd be a handful more landings but then absolutely bugger-all for at LEAST 50 years, then I'd have SCOFFED in their face, and gone and made a Buck Rogers starfighter out of an eggbox.

I was but by 1972 we'd seen it all before. It was so LAST decade darling.

Actually it stopped because it cost the US taxpayers an absolute shedload of cash which they hadn't got the will to spend by 1972 (Vietnam war, looming energy crises etc)
In March 1966, NASA told Congress the "run-out cost" of the Apollo program to put men on the moon would be an estimated $22.718 Billion for the 13-year program which eventually accomplished six successful missions between July 1969 and December 1972.

According to Steve Garber, the NASA History website curator, the final cost of project Apollo was between $20 and $25.4 billion in 1969 dollars (or approximately $135 billion in 2005 dollars).

The costs associated with the Apollo spacecraft and Saturn rockets amounted to about $83 billion Apollo spacecraft: $28 billion (Command/Service Module: $17 billion; Lunar Module: $11-billion), Saturn I, Saturn IB, Saturn V launch vehicles: about $46 billion] in 2005 dollars.



It was all about getting there, and once we'd got there, there didn't seem much point in going again and again and again
 


I agree, Easy.

I can remember the Tomorrow's World programmes of my youth, where the presenters earnestly forecast that by 2010 we'd all be flying to work in our own personal spaceships, wearing outfits made for some unfathomable reason of shiny metallic material, and colonising the Moon.

Why did all future prediction shows of the 80s insist we'd be wearing shiny metal clothes?

images

and even Versace.......
GIANNI+VERSACE+CHAINMAIL+BACKLESS+DRESS+C+EARLY+80S+(3).JPG
GIANNI+VERSACE+CHAIN+MAIL+DRESS+C+EARLY+80S+(3).JPG


although the police uniform might have been a bit more interesting (BUT NOT PRACTICAL)
Sexy-Lady-Police-Uniform-BSU6060-.jpg
 


magoo

New member
Jul 8, 2003
6,682
United Kingdom
I love seeing the advancement of the human race and a moon mission would excite me but seeing as we can't even feed over half the planet at the moment i reckon the money should go on that instead...
 








Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here