Why Does No One Trust The Club

[adrian29uk]

Please correct me if I am wrong, but why it is people think the board have an evil underlying plan about Falmer. Why can they not be trusted?.

Why would a man who came in saved this club have an evil plan?

They said work starts in December. Even the contractor who is building the site said work will start in December, so why does no one trust what they say?

If by the middle of next year nothing has started, then you have the right to ask what's going on, but please keep the bloody faith off the field and on the field. And if by the middle of next year nothing has started I'm completely wrong.

 

[Knotty]

Please correct me if I am wrong, but why it is people think the board have an evil underlying plan about Falmer. Why can they not be trusted?.

Why would a man who came in saved this club have an evil plan?

They said work starts in December. Even the contractor who is building the site said work will start in December, so why does no one trust what they say?

If by the middle of next year nothing has started, then you have the right to ask what's going on, but please keep the bloody faith off the field and on the field. And if by the middle of next year nothing has started I'm completely wrong.

Because we live in an age when no-one or nothing is a victim of circumstance; it is an age of blame.

If something is not as we want it to be, and is not delivered exactly when we want it, then someone is automatically to blame and we have the right to criticise...criticise...and criticise... Reasons, evidence and circumstances do not matter, someone has to be at fault.

 

[sir albion]

because 12-13 years waiting and internal errors costing years its understandable

 

[Knotty]

because 12-13 years waiting and internal errors costing years its understandable

What internal errors?

 

[sir albion]

What internal errors?

You will recall the board forgetting something small in in the falmer application over 2 years ago which set us back a year,and now this latest setback.

 

[Knotty]

You will recall the board forgetting something small in in the falmer application over 2 years ago which set us back a year,and now this latest setback.

Was that the board? I thought it was someone in John Prescott's department who worded the permission document badly and left a loophole for LDC to appeal.

 

[Alex Alex Dawson oo! oo!]

You will recall the board forgetting something small in in the falmer application over 2 years ago which set us back a year,and now this latest setback.

I think that was a civil servant's error in the first planning approval letter, and it delayed the final approval by 19 months.

 

[Curious Orange]

Please correct me if I am wrong, but why it is people think the board have an evil underlying plan about Falmer. Why can they not be trusted?.

Why would a man who came in saved this club have an evil plan?

They said work starts in December. Even the contractor who is building the site said work will start in December, so why does no one trust what they say?

If by the middle of next year nothing has started, then you have the right to ask what's going on, but please keep the bloody faith off the field and on the field. And if by the middle of next year nothing has started I'm completely wrong.

I'm sure most of us don't think like that at all, personally I'm just fed up of arguing the toss with idiots who see conspiracies where there aren't any.

 

[sir albion]

Was that the board? I thought it was someone in John Prescott's department who worded the permission document badly and left a loophole for LDC to appeal.

Its a long time ago i recall maybe 3 years or so,but pretty sure it was a board error and a very small one.

 

[Knotty]

Its a long time ago i recall maybe 3 years or so,but pretty sure it was a board error and a very small one.

So you don't really know, but you are prepared to blame the board for us having to wait 12-13 years for Falmer?

That's like someone who doesn't like you blaming you for drinking their pint, when they don't even know if you were in the pub!

From what I can see you WANT the board to be at fault, even if you don't KNOW that they are.

 

[Easy 10]

Its a long time ago i recall maybe 3 years or so,but pretty sure it was a board error and a very small one.

No. It was an error by a civil servant who said in the wording of the original letter of consent that the stadium was "within the built-up area of Brighton Hove" - which it isn't. LDC siezed on this immediately, and the lawyers got another 2 years worth of milage out of this sorry saga.

The error had NOTHING to do with the club.

 

[Alex Alex Dawson oo! oo!]

Its a long time ago i recall maybe 3 years or so,but pretty sure it was a board error and a very small one.

The first "approval" letter from HMG in late 2005 contended that all four applications (which is what the stadium needs) fell with the B&H City boundary. This is not the case (ie an error of fact so could be challenged in law) and resulted in the govt having to invite further representations from interested parties and completely reconsider the application(s).

 

[sir albion]

The first "approval" letter from HMG in late 2005 contended that all four applications (which is what the stadium needs) fell with the B&H City boundary. This is not the case (ie an error of fact so could be challenged in law) and resulted in the govt having to invite further representations from interested parties and completely reconsider the application(s).

Looks like i got it wrong then although i do recall a cock up somewhere mind you we have had far to many cock-ups in this process

 

[Easy 10]

*sigh*
WHAT cock-ups in this process have the club committed then ?

 

[Knotty]

*sigh*
WHAT cock-ups in this process have the club committed then ?

Don't waste your time Easy. He doesn't know if there were any, or what they were, but he wants them to have occurred to support his agenda. So they did.

 

[sir albion]

*sigh*
WHAT cock-ups in this process have the club committed then ?

Give your gob a rest easy and stop making our dire board out to be the best.Im not goner troll through years of bollocks to keep you happy am i

 

[Curious Orange]

Give your gob a rest easy and stop making our dire board out to be the best.Im not goner troll through years of bollocks to keep you happy am i

So you aren't going to provide evidence to back up your argument then?

 

[sir albion]

Looks like i got it wrong then although i do recall a cock up somewhere mind you we have had far to many cock-ups in this process

If you read this from above that will exsplain numpty,so anyway where did you come from or is it follow the leader?

 

[Easy 10]

Give your gob a rest easy and stop making our dire board out to be the best.Im not goner troll through years of bollocks to keep you happy am i

Mm'kay.
I'll take that as an "I don't know" then shall I.

 

[Curious Orange]

If you read this from above that will exsplain numpty,so anyway where did you come from or is it follow the leader?

I have read the whole thread, and indeed I have previously contributed to it, I was just wondering what your other inferred cock-ups (the civil servant map reading fiasco excepted) were. I don't need an itemised list, but an example would be nice.