blue and white army
New member
Does "poor morale" explain a consistent inability to place an accurate pass?
Yes, the players just look so deflated heading out onto the pitch
Does "poor morale" explain a consistent inability to place an accurate pass?
Why do people blame the manager?
He signs the players,
he trains the players,
he picks the team,
he organises the team,
he sets the tactics,
he picks Hawk when clearly injured,
he plays Murray when he knew he was unfit,
he plays Virgo on the wing,
he plays Virgo in midfield,
he dismantles a promising team that finished 7th,
he ignores the home grown players in favour of anyone he can get on loan,
he choses to defend leads at home against poor sides (sometimes with 10 men)
he cannot appreciate we need to pass and move rather than hit long balls when against 9 men,
he thinks the under-performing players "need a cuddle"
he sounds like we should have expected to lose at home to mid-table teams with famous names,
he still needs the left back, creative midfielder and forward cover that we needed 8 months ago,
he leaves our most creative player (a loanee) on the bench when we are crying out for him,
is that enough reasons?
Why do people blame the manager?
He signs the players,
he trains the players,
he picks the team,
he organises the team,
he sets the tactics,
he picks Hawk when clearly injured,
he plays Murray when he knew he was unfit,
he plays Virgo on the wing,
he plays Virgo in midfield,
he dismantles a promising team that finished 7th,
he ignores the home grown players in favour of anyone he can get on loan,
he choses to defend leads at home against poor sides (sometimes with 10 men)
he cannot appreciate we need to pass and move rather than hit long balls when against 9 men,
he thinks the under-performing players "need a cuddle"
he sounds like we should have expected to lose at home to mid-table teams with famous names,
he still needs the left back, creative midfielder and forward cover that we needed 8 months ago,
he leaves our most creative player (a loanee) on the bench when we are crying out for him,
is that enough reasons?
Why do people blame the manager?
He signs the players,
he trains the players,
he picks the team,
he organises the team,
he sets the tactics,
he picks Hawk when clearly injured,
he plays Murray when he knew he was unfit,
he plays Virgo on the wing,
he plays Virgo in midfield,
he dismantles a promising team that finished 7th,
he ignores the home grown players in favour of anyone he can get on loan,
he choses to defend leads at home against poor sides (sometimes with 10 men)
he cannot appreciate we need to pass and move rather than hit long balls when against 9 men,
he thinks the under-performing players "need a cuddle"
he sounds like we should have expected to lose at home to mid-table teams with famous names,
he still needs the left back, creative midfielder and forward cover that we needed 8 months ago,
he leaves our most creative player (a loanee) on the bench when we are crying out for him,
is that enough reasons?
Absolutely spot on. At the moment Micky is the football equivalent of a builder who has been asked to build a cathedral using three bricks and a packet of chewing gum.
I have seen some albion teams look tactically lost in my time, but I wouldn't drastically say this is one. Of the entire defence and midfield, there isn't a single player with skill, a good first touch, or a creative spark. As I said before, anyone who thinks a new manager will get more out of these players is in a dream, and if anyone is going to get new players in with two weeks of the transfer window to go it's Micky Adams.
At the moment Micky is the football equivalent of a builder who has been asked to build a cathedral using three bricks and a packet of chewing gum.
Haha you comedian. "Finishing touches"?? Finishing touches to what? The squad that you slated at every opportunity last season and were probably the biggest critic of the manager at the time? By all means criticise Adams as is your right, but don't claim he's destroyed some world-beating squad because 6 months ago you were criticising that too.
What the f*** are you on about?
He's not been asked to build a cathedral. He's been asked to put the finishing touches on one - and instead of doing that, he's dismantled it and built a cardboard box instead.
Pathetic.
All things you were deeply unhappy with at the time. I'm sure I don't need to revive old threads in order to prove just how anti-Wilkins and anti-certain players you were last season. You can't accept things don't happen instantly. If you get your wish and Micky goes then you'll be moaning at the next guy within weeks. At some point, somewhere along the line, you have to stop and give someone a long time to turn it around. Why not let that be now?
Not so long ago people were saying £400K for the likes of Cox and Elphick was not enough and that they were the new generation that could lead us into the Championship. Now most posters on here reckon they're shit.
They're not shit, and we just need a manager who can get the best out of them. Elphick played well alongside Butters and Cox played well when he was allowed to roam in the hole behind the strikers.