Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Why are people blaming Dick?



cardboard

New member
Jul 8, 2003
4,573
Mile Oak
He is just the spokesperson on the board.

Everything has to be ratified by the WHOLE board before any decisions are made.

Give the guy a break
 




Mr Burns

New member
Aug 25, 2003
5,915
Springfield
Get real.

He's the chairman. He isn't just a spokesmen as you may like to think. He an interferring , self important, old ****, who I think may be losing the plot.
 




pishhead

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2003
5,248
Everywhere
Get real.

He's the chairman. He isn't just a spokesmen as you may like to think. He an interferring , self important, old ****, who I think may be losing the plot.

He knows a hell of a lot more than we know, there is obviously things going on in the background that we are not privvy too. So shall we just trust his judgement on this one, he hasn't got too much wrong over the 10 years of his tenure has he.
 


Jimmy Grimble

Well-known member
Nov 10, 2007
10,103
Starting a revolution from my bed
Rubbish, The Blooms have the main say - Thats been the case for several years

Exactly, I really cant be bothered with the twats on here abusing Knight for something that was not only a joint decison, but a decision that will only help the club prosper.

Wilkins never had full control over players, that was obvious. Adams wont stand for players mouthing off to the press like he did.
 




Jul 5, 2003
23,777
Polegate
All of a sudden it's fashionable to think Knight's a wanker.

Nobody knows the ins and outs, but it's quite possible/probable that Wilkins dismissal was a shareholder influenced decision.

However, I would GUESS that it was Knight who insisted Micky come back.
 




Silent Bob

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Dec 6, 2004
22,172
All of a sudden it's fashionable to think Knight's a wanker.

Nobody knows the ins and outs, but it's quite possible/probable that Wilkins dismissal was a shareholder influenced decision.

However, I would GUESS that it was Knight who insisted Micky come back.
Which is bad enough in itself.

They could at least have waited until Coppell leaves Reading this summer.
 




All of a sudden it's fashionable to think Knight's a wanker.

Nobody knows the ins and outs, but it's quite possible/probable that Wilkins dismissal was a shareholder influenced decision.

It's not really fashionable-simply a handful of people spouting off against DK at every opportunity. Seemingly on every single thread at he moment.
 


Scotty Mac

New member
Jul 13, 2003
24,405
knight has ALWAYS loved adams - bloom wanted a knight man gone - mcghee, to be replaced by wilkins

is it so farfetched to think that knight has pointed out it hasnt worked, crowds have dropped, and that by bringing his own man back - adams - he can get one over on bloom?
 


GNF on Tour

Registered Twunt
Jul 7, 2003
1,365
Auckland
He is just the spokesperson on the board.

Everything has to be ratified by the WHOLE board before any decisions are made.

Give the guy a break

Thats the dumbest post I've ever read.

Knights the Chairman you plank!
 






herman gelmet

Not the tosser
Jan 20, 2008
70
worthing
He is just the spokesperson on the board.

Everything has to be ratified by the WHOLE board before any decisions are made.

Give the guy a break

Hold on. Anything that's popular with the fans, DK will be on every form of media telling how he single handedly pulled it off. Surely he must be up for a bit of criticism if it's not such a popular decision.
 










FamilyGuy

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2003
2,516
Crawley
He is just the spokesperson on the board.

Everything has to be ratified by the WHOLE board before any decisions are made.

Give the guy a break


Absolutely right!
 










Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here