Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Why are Lewes LibDems doing THIS?



Gilliver's Travels

Peripatetic
Jul 5, 2003
2,926
Brighton Marina Village
Anyone doubting why FFA is going for the jugular with Lewes LibDems needs to read these two press releases:-

Anger at Victimisation of LDC Leader

Government tramples on local residents stadium concerns [ See totally misleading picture.... ]

Many NSC people are aghast that an otherwise decent party nationally is populated by such slugs locally. You sometimes wonder if they themselves have forgotten why they have committed to pouring even more Lewes DC taxpayers' money down the drain. They have to be confronted, called to account, and forced to halt their hate-based crusade to kill off the Albion.
 




The Large One

Who's Next?
Jul 7, 2003
52,343
97.2FM
"There is a place for protest and debate... but," you won't find it at Lewes District Council.

By the way, it's not so much a totally mis-leading picture, it's a totally WRONG picture. The green field (singular) in that picture is where the coach park will be, not the stadium. The fields in the background will not be touched.

They are, without fear of contradiction, f***ing mad.
 
Last edited:


Schrödinger's Toad

Nie dla Idiotów
Jan 21, 2004
11,957
5.jpeg


About the only shot one could take without an ugly building or motorway in it.

:nono:
 


Da Man Clay

T'Blades
Dec 16, 2004
16,303
The Large One said:
"There is a place for protest and debate... but," you won't find it at Lewes District Council.

By the way, it's not so much a totally mis-leading picture, it's a totally WRONG picture. The green field (singular) in that picture is where the coach park will be, not the stadium. The fields in the background will not be touched.

They are, without fear of contradiction, f***ing mad.

Seconded
 






Gwylan

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
32,040
Uffern
Why are LDC still banging on about the two previous inspectors? They're not seeking a JR against those reports.

And if Anne de Vecchi refuses to hold open meetings, talk to the press or her constituents or seek to justify herself in any way, it's a bit rich to complain that's being bombarded with emails and letters. Perhaps if she were more open, people wouldn't have to resort to such abuse.
 




perseus

Broad Blue & White stripe
Jul 5, 2003
23,467
Sūþseaxna
Repugnant Toad said:
5.jpeg


About the only shot one could take without an ugly building or motorway in it.

:nono:

It does prove that the view is obscured and you cannot see into the dip from the top of hill anyway.
 






Seagull's Return

Active member
Nov 7, 2003
890
Brighton
The picture does at least demonstrate that the field shown has no wildlife habitat conservation significance whatsoever; unfortunately, I guess most people will just see chlorophyll and equate it with environmental value.

So, more deception (or at best a kind of misleading incompetence) from the Lib Dems, then.
 


















Lady Whistledown

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 7, 2003
48,279
Victimisation, my arse.

If you're happy to take on the responsibilities of being council leader, you by default accept that you're going to deal with people who don't agree with you. That includes being sent e-mails to your advertised council e-mail address.

Granted, if anyone's sent her anything offensive, it's not only unfair but counter-productive, and even we, who despise everything she stands for, can't condone that.

But peppering her with e-mails about the ludicrous juducial review system is fair game as far as I'm concerned. You can't possibly be done for harassment under the law for sending her e-mails in her position of councillor, about council issues, unless they're personal, threatening or ridiculously persistent, and even that would be a borderline judgement.
 


Bwian

Kiss my (_!_)
Jul 14, 2003
15,898
Gwylan said:
Why are LDC still banging on about the two previous inspectors?

It's interesting that they are still harping on about the first two inspectors' reports-perhaps they didn't read this extract from the ODPM's letter?

30. At the time of the first part of the inquiry, the applicants had
not presented sufficient information to enable a robust, quantifiable
assessment to be made of alternative sites. The first Inspector
concluded therefore that this particular requirement of PPG7 had not
been satisfactorily demonstrated and, on the basis of the limited
information before him, concluded that there were other potential sites
which could be developed which were outside the AONB. However, the
Secretary of State has accorded very limited weight to the first
Inspector's assessment of alternative sites, given the limited amount of
information before him. The re-opened inquiry gave the parties an
opportunity to fully assess the issue of alternative sites to that at
Falmer. The Secretary of State has therefore accorded considerable
weight to the second Inspector's conclusions on this matter, given that
he was in possession of more detailed and more recent information
regarding each of the alternative sites.
 
Last edited:




Bwian

Kiss my (_!_)
Jul 14, 2003
15,898
"Two independent and highly experienced planning inspectors agree with us and it's difficult to see how the Deputy Prime Minister can ignore their recommendation."

Erm-no they didn't you stupid tree hugging, fence sitting FUCKWITS. The "highly experienced inspectors" didn't have all of the facts-as confirmed in the ODPM's letter. Have any of you morons actually read anything relating to this issue?

Norman Baker-I hope somebody superglues your asshole shut and forces you to consume copious amounts of chicken phal.
 


The Oldman

I like the Hat
NSC Patron
Jul 12, 2003
7,188
In the shadow of Seaford Head
I take great comfort from all this. It's obvious that these Lib Dems
had no idea what they were talking about when they made their Cabinet decision or the impact it would have within the Lewes area. They are running scared but they will not back down because they will lose any credibility they may have once had.

As for the tories who went with them, well what do you expect from that lot?
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here