Baldseagull
Well-known member
No, sorry, don't buy any of that. If the LibDems had stuck with their principles (yes, it's politics, I know) we could only have had a minority Tory govt at worst and THAT would have made a difference. And yes, I know that it's the nature of democracy that sometimes your lot lose, and yes I accept that it happens too often for my liking. My vote last time went in a tactical way to a party which was opposed to the Tories, until the whiff of a bit of power came in, then it was "principles ? What principles ?" "Manifesto ? Wossat ?" and five tedious years of Conservative government with the weak kneed CMD and his bean counting oppo whose greatest claim was to halve the bill we had to pay to the EU. Only we didn't, and he hadn't.
Oh, and the Tories won't pick up all the LibDem seats, though I hope the latter are back to needing a four-seater taxi to take them all to Parliament.
I think the Libs had to form a coalition with someone, we needed a government that could get on and do stuff, a minority government would have seen us deeper in the shit than we were. I think they also knew it would be damaging for their party but in the best interests of the country, so I respect the decision.
We had a chance to bring in the Alternative Vote system because the Libs were in coalition, the referendum returned a No, but if it had gone through you would not have had to waste your vote to vote Labour, you could still have had your Labour vote 1st and put other parties candidates 2nd, 3rd etc. to ensure your vote would count in some way even if the Labour guy was well out of the race.
Compromises have been made by both parties to form what was a much needed majority Government. Power sharing and consensus politics has always been a liberal principle, so I don't see forming a coalition with the Cons as dropping their principles for the sake of power, it was what the country needed and they got some of their manifesto put through.