Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Who will light the torch tonight inside the stadium?



strings

Moving further North...
Feb 19, 2006
9,969
Barnsley
Perhaps we could get Alan Sugar to light it with his magic finger:


9f94_35.JPG
 








ROSM

Well-known member
Dec 26, 2005
6,771
Just far enough away from LDC
Bannister is a great choice. What he did was break a barrier that was considered the extreme. Its a bit like the first sub 10 second 100 metres.

Although I would be happy with Redgrave (5 golds at 5 different games, the last after fighting colitis and diabetes) or Daley T (all round sportsman and unbeaten for nigh on 5 years and 2 olympics) as they both showed in their field, longevity of performance.
 






Tricky Dicky

New member
Jul 27, 2004
13,558
Sunny Shoreham
Bannister is a great choice. What he did was break a barrier that was considered the extreme. Its a bit like the first sub 10 second 100 metres.

Although I would be happy with Redgrave (5 golds at 5 different games, the last after fighting colitis and diabetes) or Daley T (all round sportsman and unbeaten for nigh on 5 years and 2 olympics) as they both showed in their field, longevity of performance.

Although on this thread we already have someone disputing he was the first sub-4 person, but I'm still waiting to find out why.
 




Gritt23

New member
Jul 7, 2003
14,902
Meopham, Kent.
Surely, after his shocking omission from Team GB, it simplt has to be because will be lighting the flame tonight. Yes, for my money it is bound to be ..... Greg Bobkin.
 




jonny.rainbow

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2005
6,846
It's Steve Redgrave.

A guy on thee news who'd been involved in the planning answered when asked by the reporter who'd be lighting it, "I could tell you but you'd have to shoot me if I did." Obvious reference to Redgrave's speech in Sydney.
 


Gritt23

New member
Jul 7, 2003
14,902
Meopham, Kent.

And while I think about it, you're wrong Alan, as you haven't EMPLOYED these people in the first place. I do realise "you application will not be going onto the next stage of the interview process" is not as catchy, but these people are simply NOT being "fired".
 


METALMICKY

Well-known member
Jan 30, 2004
6,826
If its it feckin Beckham it will be a national disgrace. Its bad enough that music wise the best we can do is Duran Duran and the Spice Girls'.

Bottom line is that it needs to be a Brit with real Olympic credentials i.e. Gold medals and certainly not someone like Colin Jackson who has made a TV career from getting a Silver AKA "the first loser medal"!
 




jackanada

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2011
3,507
Brighton
Who was then ? I know wiki isn't necessarily accurate but ...

"In the sport of athletics, the four-minute mile is the act of completing the mile run (1,760 yards, or 1,609.344 metres) in less than four minutes. It was first achieved in 1954 by Roger Bannister in 3:59.4"

Read this

I think it's quite convincing. A lot of sporting feats were expunged with the start of the victorian amateur era - the toffs didn't like getting whipped by miners and farmhands.
 




Two Professors

Two Mad Professors
Jul 13, 2009
7,617
Multicultural Brum
Ernest the ARSonist gets my vote.
 




TWOCHOICEStom

Well-known member
Sep 22, 2007
10,909
Brighton
Becks hits a curving fireball over a wall into Redgrave's rowboat, he rows up to the edge of the big torch where Bannister lights the flame. Sorted.
 


blue'n'white

Well-known member
Oct 5, 2005
3,082
2nd runway at Gatwick
As long as it ain't Beckham I don't really mind
If you HAVE to be an Olympian (which I believe you do and i take to be a gold medal winner) it surely has to be Sir Steve Redgrave for all his achievements over 5 Olympics which will be incredibly hard to beat.

It's gone awful quiet on the "James Bond" thing in recent weeks so it may be Daniel Craig !

However I'm not putting it past Danny Boyle to have Beckham pissing a stream of fire into a cauldron !!
 
Last edited:


nwgull

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2003
14,533
Manchester
Read this

I think it's quite convincing. A lot of sporting feats were expunged with the start of the victorian amateur era - the toffs didn't like getting whipped by miners and farmhands.

It's not convincing at all to me. There are no records or substantiation of the validity of the record, just the writer's suggestion of how they might have measured the distance and accurately timed the race. Chances are that both aspects were inaccurate, however if the writer were to suggest this then it would be a crap article.
 








Tricky Dicky

New member
Jul 27, 2004
13,558
Sunny Shoreham
Read this

I think it's quite convincing. A lot of sporting feats were expunged with the start of the victorian amateur era - the toffs didn't like getting whipped by miners and farmhands.


That's rather unofficial. Meanwhile they've stopped taking bets on Bannister.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here