Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Who was the best boxer ?.

Who was/is the best boxer ?.

  • Watson

    Votes: 6 7.9%
  • Benn

    Votes: 8 10.5%
  • Eubank

    Votes: 47 61.8%
  • Calzaghe

    Votes: 15 19.7%

  • Total voters
    76
  • Poll closed .


Uncle Spielberg

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2003
43,088
Lancing
Middleweight

Eubank, Benn, Watson or the 20 match unbeaten Calzaghe ?.

Who was/is the best ?.
 




Dave the OAP

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
46,759
at home
Thomas The Hit Man Hearns
 


Lammy

Registered Abuser
Oct 1, 2003
7,581
Newhaven/Lewes/Atlanta
Unfortunately it was Eubank. Calzaghe has the potential but has a way to go yet...
 




Rougvie

Rising Damp
Aug 29, 2003
5,131
Hove, f***ing ACTUALLY.
The hype and interest surrounding those fights was amazing.

I always wanted Benn to win, but you cant argue with Eubank's record or his ability which shades it for me on who was the better.
 








Sid James

New member
Nov 14, 2005
501
Can't speak for Calzaghe because I don't watch anymore.

I think it was Watson, he was outclassing Eubank prior to THAT haymaker. Eubank had a fantastic chin and was a very good counterpuncher but he looked silly whenever he had to go after someone. Benn was a great scrapper and all heart.

Steve Collins might have something to say on this as well
 
Last edited:




watsongooal

New member
Jul 7, 2003
2,556
Chislehurst
Lammy said:
Unfortunately it was Eubank. Calzaghe has the potential but has a way to go yet...

Not really. he is what 33 so not much potential left. I think he would beat all of them myself. Eubank lost it after watson and wouldnt hit anyone.
 




watsongooal

New member
Jul 7, 2003
2,556
Chislehurst
Basil Fawlty said:
Chris Eubank, without a shadow of a doubt.

On what basis?
 




Ernest

Stupid IDIOT
Nov 8, 2003
42,748
LOONEY BIN
My favourite

brutus.jpg
 








Gritt23

New member
Jul 7, 2003
14,902
Meopham, Kent.
Sid James said:
I think it was Watson, he was outclassing Eubank prior to THAT haymaker.

I thought that was the sign of a great champion. The fight was close, and Eubank had made a habit of sneaking the decision in a few close ones, so it was far from clear cut which way the scoring would be.

Then Watson floored him, and facing a 10-8 round, Eubank summoned up everything he had to try and recover the situation, and threw a tremendous upper-cut - not a haymaker in my book - that floored Watson (and of course worse, when his head hit the bottom rope).

You make it sound lucky, but that's what true champions do, they pull it out of the bag when they absolutely have to do it.
 
Last edited:


Napper

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2003
24,449
Sussex
voted Eubank , although since the Wwatson incident he was a shadow of his former self.

Benn was explosive and a warrior and would get vote for entertainment.

Calzaghe has fought to many bums although if he wins the supposed big fight next March then you'd have to say him really
 


Sid James

New member
Nov 14, 2005
501
Gritt23 said:
I thought that was the sign of a great champion. The fight was close, and Eubank had made a habit of sneaking the decision in a few close ones, so it was far from clear cut which way the scoring would be.

Then Watson floored him, and facing a 10-8 round, Eubank summoned up everything he had to try and recover the situation, and threw a tremendous upper-cut - not a haymaker in my book - that floored Watson (and of course worse, when his head hit the bottom rope).

You make it sound lucky, but that's what true champions do, they pull it out of the bag when they absolutely have to do it.

I didn't mean it to sound that way and I agree that he was a very good champion and far from lucky. I was just using that fight to put forward the point that Watson was a better technical boxer, but then as you say Eubank was a fighter, just not the best boxer imo.
 










Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here