[Albion] Who is good enough for the Albion's Premier League squad?

[Papa Lazarou]

So, after 38 votes, only Knockaert, March and Stephens are 100%

 

[pornomagboy]

can't vote

Sent from my SM-G928F using Tapatalk

 

[Papa Lazarou]

So, after 38 votes, only Knockaert, March and Stephens are 100%

49 votes and still the BIG 3 out in front.

 

[Bigtomfu]

15 yes, had to be harsh and murder some darlings (Goldson, Bong, Baldock, Murphy) and others never stood a chance - KLL, Norwood, Ince, and Towell.

Harsh but fair I feel. Some due to lack of experience but may eventually make the grade, just not this year and others because they never will be good enough.

 

[Goring-by-Seagull]

Poor Rohan

 

[Luke93]

Only 16 players have over 50% by the time of this post. That means about half of us think we're 9 players short!

 

[BLOCK F]

Some way to go, methinks.

 

[Kalimantan Gull]

Voted all of them except Ince and Towell. The other are perfectly good enough to be at least the worst player in a 25-man squad

 

[Napper]

pascal Gross 94 votes lol

all based on youtube

 

[hans kraay fan club]

pascal Gross 94 votes lol

all based on youtube

Well I included him, and have never seen a youtube video of him playing. I based my vote on the STATS - on the fact that he was ranked #1 for chances created in the entire Bundesliga last season, despite playing in a poor side.

 

[Deleted member 2719]

Who do you think has what it takes?

(Hold your horses - multi-choice poll en route)

Can you put that poll in an excel spreadsheet (every so often) in order of highest to lowest percent, so i stop getting blurry eyes trying to work out the top 11!!

Please.

 

[Nixonator]

pascal Gross 94 votes lol

all based on youtube

This was a strange one to be included I thought, but I voted for him on the basis of his stats last season in a struggling side. It's all conjecture anyway.

What I want to know is who HASN'T voted for Knockaert, Dunk & Stephens.

If those 3 aren't going to cut it then we're seriously up shit creek.

 

[Machiavelli]

This was a strange one to be included I thought, but I voted for him on the basis of his stats last season in a struggling side. It's all conjecture anyway.

What I want to know is who HASN'T voted for Knockaert, Dunk & Stephens.

If those 3 aren't going to cut it then we're seriously up shit creek.

Agree, but suspect there's a few uncorrectable errors in there (i.e. someone forgot to tick -- rather than didn't tick -- Dunk).

 

[Giraffe]

Just 9 for me, and that was being a bit generous with Murray and Sidwell who are arguably past it in Premier League terms.

 

[Giraffe]

What I want to know is who HASN'T voted for Knockaert, Dunk & Stephens.

.

I didn't vote for Stephens. Think he will be seriously found out in the Premier League against stronger more physical midfielders.

 

[Nixonator]

I didn't vote for Stephens. Think he will be seriously found out in the Premier League against stronger more physical midfielders.

Must be a huge leap in physicality then as Championship midfielders have been bouncing off him the past 2 seasons.

 

[hans kraay fan club]

Just 9 for me, and that was being a bit generous with Murray and Sidwell who are arguably past it in Premier League terms.

I didn't vote for Stephens. Think he will be seriously found out in the Premier League against stronger more physical midfielders.

You DID tick Sidwell, but NOT Stephens?

 

[nicko31]

Poor old Ritchie, I hope he gets a chance at some point

 

[Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo]

I have 17 players and thought I was being generous, could push it to 18 or 19 as I excluded Skalak and Murphy but that leaves another 7 or 8 players needed.

 

[Machiavelli]

I ticked 15, but in retrospect, I'm being a little harsh and would include (the previously excluded) Maenpaa and Bong.
That said, I do think we need to make six or seven more signings, all of which improve our squad, which would enable certain players (Skalak, Hemed) to be sold elsewhere (thereby generating some money for two more quality signings in January).