GoldWithFalmer
Seaweed! Seaweed!
Yes, but this legalises and endorses it.
yes-it does guess those that did return home recently may well be returning again-now that was no fault of the current government
Yes, but this legalises and endorses it.
Because disabled employee's cost more and generally aren't as productive as an abled person. Harsh but true.
Because disabled employee's cost more and generally aren't as productive as an abled person. Harsh but true.
I thought all business had to be disabled friendly now thought that was law, so hiring someone should not actually cost any extra.
All of us? The only thing I can't do is talk on the phone. It would work quite well if someone would do my phone work for me.
I've spent the last sixteen months looking for work. As soon as the potential employer knew that I was unable to use a phone and, effectively, less competent than my fellow applicants, they did not want to know.
I applied for hundreds of jobs in that 1.5 years and i bagged one interview! One!
Applying for entry level jobs, they wondered why a 30 year old with a degree wanted a school leavers job.
I could be very productive if I was given half the chance. Aren't you a driving instructor? What gives you the right to generalize in such a crass fashion?
Do you know anything about disabilities and employment?
Why would I cost more money and why would I be less productive than you? Why? Would your ability to use a telephone make up for your obvious short comings in general intelligence and attitude?
Roll out the barrel...