The Wizard
Well-known member
- Jul 2, 2009
- 18,401
Using racist names... That is good after the whole racism thing on here.
What? Where?
Using racist names... That is good after the whole racism thing on here.
What? Where?
Foresight as to the direction the thread would start to take, probably.Using racist names... That is good after the whole racism thing on here.
It is an acknowledged fact that Jack Charlton started by playing players whose grandmothers etc distance removed made them elligible France have done the same with African colonies that were once under French rule. We have done the same in cricket with South Africans especially but does that make it right.
Foresight as to the direction the thread would start to take, probably.
The rules are extremely clear, you need to qualify for a passport - this was clarified after a Northern Irish player who qualified for one under the Good Friday Agreement declared for Ireland.
That means you need an Irish citizen parent or grandparent. Thats it. Some of the "non Irish" players who've played or play for us would have been declared to the foreign births registry and received Irish citizenship from the off - Kevin Kilbane for one.
England could do much the same, if it wanted or needed to. And good jesus, Ireland abuses the cricket rules obscenely.... at lest half of the first selection aren't "Irish" by any sense of the word!
Only if posters take it there. I just commented on the cultural make up of Coventry. Hardly racist
I think Don Quixote was referring to the title of the thread.
Which one has the most genuine players that are either French or Irish by birthright and not by some obscure rule about relatives and ancestors.
Ireland. Us Celts should stick together.
any Bretons in the French side?
Using racist names... That is good after the whole racism thing on here.
any Bretons in the French side?