Icy Gull
Back on the rollercoaster
- Jul 5, 2003
- 72,015
If they're must not lose games, I guess there will be consequences if they do? What would that be?
The same as all must not lose games, joy or despair..that’s it
If they're must not lose games, I guess there will be consequences if they do? What would that be?
It's coastal, Lewes, hygiene and Challis. You'll need to make a bit more effort with your spelling if you want to be taken seriously.
The same as all must not lose games, joy or despair..that’s it
If they're must not lose games, I guess there will be consequences if they do? What would that be?
This. It is the truth. But just like the great Russian public that can't believe that they're not doing Ukraine a favour by clearing out the fascists, so it is that some can't accept the fact that for many, many years Palace was just another 3rd. Division South club of no more significance to us than Orient or Reading (Portsmouth of course were well out of our league in those days!)
I'm not arguing there isn't a rivalry. I'm just pointing out the fact that there hasn't always been a rivalry. I fully understand that many people will not have been around long enough to remember the time before the rivalry - but whether they can remember it or not, that time did exist.It’s nearly 50 years since the Palace rivalry really took hold now. Most fans will struggle to remember these before times even if they were around then and who now can’t “accept the fact”?
And of course Palace are our rivals- I know NSC likes a contrarian but you might as well argue that we’re not blue and white or that Sussex isn’t by the Sea.
I'm not arguing there isn't a rivalry. I'm just pointing out the fact that there hasn't always been a rivalry. I fully understand that many people will not have been around long enough to remember the time before the rivalry - but whether they can remember it or not, that time did exist.
Of course although there’s a couple on this thread who can’t resist challenging it. .But you seemed perplexed that some weren’t aware it’s only recent ish history or couldn’t accept it. What did you mean by that ? It’s as much a part of our history as 1997 or 1983 or 1979 - right ?
Orient never , always been Palace , sometimes Portsmouth as they are the closest team
OK I'll have a go. We got yellow in amongst the blue and white, and the vast majority of Sussex isn't by the sea. Crawley is over 20 miles in land.It’s nearly 50 years since the Palace rivalry really took hold now. Most fans will struggle to remember these before times even if they were around then and who now can’t “accept the fact”?
And of course Palace are our rivals- I know NSC likes a contrarian but you might as well argue that we’re not blue and white or that Sussex isn’t by the Sea.
OK I'll have a go. We got yellow in amongst the blue and white, and the vast majority of Sussex isn't by the sea. Crawley is over 20 miles in land.
However, Palace are 100% Brighton's rivals. Probably our only ones, which is what I put down on that stupid online survey
I feel a little sorry for Crawley, clearly ours closet rivals in Proximity but we just ignore them like they are non league
Nah... well wide of the mark.We did but Orient were our biggest rivals at the time, imo you need to be playing a team regularly to consider them your main rivals
We also had a brief flirtation with Cardiff, Reading and Saints as our biggest rivals imo
And Cheaterfraud.
OK I'll have a go. We got yellow in amongst the blue and white, and the vast majority of Sussex isn't by the sea. Crawley is over 20 miles in land.
However, Palace are 100% Brighton's rivals. Probably our only ones, which is what I put down on that stupid online survey
We had a few lively games with Southend in that era. Particularly a first game of the season 2000/1, I seem to remember.
Not a rivalry but an annoyance.