Which teams are we going to finish above next season

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Which teams are we going to finish above next season?


  • Total voters
    123
  • Poll closed .


Jolly Red Giant

Well-known member
Jul 11, 2015
2,615
Huddersfield will likely go straight back down - can't see how they can stay up.

You can be sure Benitez has been promised a sh*tload of money to stay at Newcastle and while it is no guarantee you would have to expect him to bring in some decent players to keep them up.

Swansea could be in big trouble if they lose Sigurdsson an don't replace him - same with Watford if Deeney leaves.

I think Burnley and Bournemouth are a little ahead of these - both have some decent players - I think Dyche does a good job, not so convinced with Bournemouth, but Defoe will score goals for them if he signs.

Of the others I think Stoke and West Ham are n a knife-edge and could run into trouble easily.

But - the reality is that Hughton needs to sign a few players to even have a hope of keeping Brighton up - including a couple of strikers who can score a few goals. And it is no small task - these days you have to spend £50m-£75m a year just to stand still in the Premiership - and Brighton aren't even at the races yet.

Last season
Swansea signed 11 players during the summer and spent more than £50m. They signed 4 more and spend another £20m.
Watford signed 10 players costing about £55m -
Burnley signed 7 players for about £20m - and spent another £20m in January
Bournemouth signed 7 players for £30m but got Ake and Wiltshire on loan
Palace signed 8 for over £55m - and spent another £30m in January
Stoke spent about £30m but struggled most of the season
West Ham spent about £70m
Leicester spent about £85m
Everton spent about £75m

The three relegated clubs
Middlesborough signed 11 players for about £30m
Sunderland signed 9 players for around £30m
Hull signed 8 player for about £20m

And remember - most of these clubs were starting with a much better squad than Brighton (or any team that comes up from the Championship).
 




Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
25,994


Eeyore

Colonel Hee-Haw of Queen's Park
NSC Patron
Apr 5, 2014
25,994
Huddersfield will likely go straight back down - can't see how they can stay up.

You can be sure Benitez has been promised a sh*tload of money to stay at Newcastle and while it is no guarantee you would have to expect him to bring in some decent players to keep them up.

Swansea could be in big trouble if they lose Sigurdsson an don't replace him - same with Watford if Deeney leaves.

I think Burnley and Bournemouth are a little ahead of these - both have some decent players - I think Dyche does a good job, not so convinced with Bournemouth, but Defoe will score goals for them if he signs.

Of the others I think Stoke and West Ham are n a knife-edge and could run into trouble easily.

But - the reality is that Hughton needs to sign a few players to even have a hope of keeping Brighton up - including a couple of strikers who can score a few goals. And it is no small task - these days you have to spend £50m-£75m a year just to stand still in the Premiership - and Brighton aren't even at the races yet.

Last season
Swansea signed 11 players during the summer and spent more than £50m. They signed 4 more and spend another £20m.
Watford signed 10 players costing about £55m -
Burnley signed 7 players for about £20m - and spent another £20m in January
Bournemouth signed 7 players for £30m but got Ake and Wiltshire on loan
Palace signed 8 for over £55m - and spent another £30m in January
Stoke spent about £30m but struggled most of the season
West Ham spent about £70m
Leicester spent about £85m
Everton spent about £75m

The three relegated clubs
Middlesborough signed 11 players for about £30m
Sunderland signed 9 players for around £30m
Hull signed 8 player for about £20m

And remember - most of these clubs were starting with a much better squad than Brighton (or any team that comes up from the Championship).

I don't think it's about the amount a team spends although they need resources. It's who you spend it on. Newcastle United spent £30 million in the second tier this year and needed to rely on us to screw the title up at the end. Those figures don't concern me. If we feel the need to sign nine or ten players- that would.
 




One Teddy Maybank

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Aug 4, 2006
23,011
Worthing
And remember - most of these clubs were starting with a much better squad than Brighton (or any team that comes up from the Championship).

Very much a matter of opinion.

However, very interesting post. Arguably disrupting the squad by signing 8 plus is not good for morale and could significantly disrupt playing style.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 














sir albion

New member
Jan 6, 2007
13,055
SWINDON
Think we'll finish bottom as we will give most of our current squad a crack and that will not be anywhere good enough sadly....but it's not the end of the world as the premiership is boring anyway and we'll get parachute payments:)
 






Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
I'd like to have put plucky moneybags Bournemouth but they have too many decent players and a very good dislikeable manager.
 










Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top