sussex_guy2k2
Well-known member
- Jun 6, 2014
- 4,473
I’ve said “well what about all of the other sports mentioned?” and I stand by that.Maintaining a grass lawn isn't keeping the greenery, grass cut every few days to a short sward is providing next to zero ecological benefits. It might as well be tarmac. In comparison to other sports, golf disproportionately uses resources over massive areas just for 5 people to knock a ball around on a Saturday morning.
If you're going to say well what about F1, that would be next on the list.
Ultimately most golf courses have trees. That alone makes them more environmentally friendly than most sports.
It’s no different to having a well kept football, cricket or rugby pitch, except that’s there’s some balance being offered.
The other big problem with the “golf is not environmentally friendly” argument, is that it assumes the alternative is that the land would be used for big areas of natural beauty. I know this is hard for many to fathom, but most golf courses are privately owned by people who want to make money off of them, so when the alternative is housing, business blocks etc, then yes, a golf course is much more environmentally friendly.