Catch 22.
I really didn't get on with that. One of the best books ever apparently. Pffffffttttt.
I couldn't get into it either, deadly dull.
Catch 22.
I really didn't get on with that. One of the best books ever apparently. Pffffffttttt.
Not a great writer, but his books are really easy to read because they are so unchallenging. Sometimes that has an appeal. I think I would struggle not to finish a Peter James book only for that reason. For some reason I'm unfamiliar with that particular title. I wonder why
I never finished "Something Happened" by Joseph Heller, despite trying for about 5 years.
The hobbit. Just got a little bit too tedious.
Boo hiss boo to you. Booooo. Hiss.....boo.
Don't get all the criticism of LoTR - it's widely recognised as one of the greatest books written with hundreds of millions of fans and sales toboot. It might not be your cuppa but that doesn't make it tedious. Just you're not exactly target audience. I wouldn't try reading many of the classics because I can't say I'm interested in Mr Darcy's torso, beautifully described as it may be. I.e. Chances are I'll yawn my head off. I might not but chances are I will. I know this in ADVANCE! But I'd never call Jane Austin, Bronte, Dickins etc boring. Just not my style so I won't try and read them. You can judge a book to a degree by its cover. Seems some on here haven't got the wit to know that, no wonder they struggled to get beyond the preface if so!!
TOLKEIN IN!
The Road to Wigan Pier.
OK, I was trying to read it as a bored 14 year old, but I found it completely turgid. Gave up after about 50 pages.