Why are Chelsea fans (and some of the media) wetting themselves about the other bid/s being confidential? As the selling club, it wouldn't be Albion's place to disclose any information like that. If the bidding club wants to, that's up to them.
Intervention? They’re probably ordering his ‘Poster of the Year’ award.That racist post by ‘the Celery King’ referring to Tony as a ‘grubby little Jewish trader’ has now been on the Shed End Caicedo thread for 10 hours. No intervention from the moderators of that board. There is not much we can do about it but I know our club monitor NSC and they have a lot more clout than us…
I had similarly assumed that either a deal had been struck, or a hissy fit thrown.What have I missed?
24 hours away from NYC and 30+ pages have been added to this thread.
There's been a mystery bid from another prem club? And one from Saudi Arabia?
Nothing really more then you have already stated and Chelsea "fans" melts going in to overload and being the pr!cks they areWhat have I missed?
24 hours away from NYC and 30+ pages have been added to this thread.
There's been a mystery bid from another prem club? And one from Saudi Arabia?
Well, yeah. Perhaps others could stop posting this crap on here.I had to watch it first before I could see what an idiot he was!
I had forgotten about him.Just 4 weeks of the transfer window left and Chelsea still haven't offered the required fee and got the deal over the line.
Losestanley is having a nightmare. Lol.
Yeah, like you I am pondering this one. The guy in the video is absolutely spot on when he says that it is an obvious move in a transfer negotiation, to either pretend or manufacture interest from elsewhere in an attempt to worry the buyer that they might lose out. And he's right, it IS an obvious move, and everyone knows it to be an obvious, see-through move, so why are we playing it when we are pretty confident that our team are a step above in their negotiation skills?If the roles were reversed, I would be pretty suspicious about unnamed clubs making a bid for a player we have been after for most of the window.
I don't think for a second that we are trying to pull off such a bad bluff, but it is an unusual announcement.
Just 4 weeks of the transfer window left and Chelsea still haven't offered the required fee and got the deal over the line.
Losestanley is having a nightmare. Lol.
This is fun!
You need to have a nice cup of tea and just trust in TonyYeah, like you I am pondering this one. The guy in the video is absolutely spot on when he says that it is an obvious move in a transfer negotiation, to either pretend or manufacture interest from elsewhere in an attempt to worry the buyer that they might lose out. And he's right, it IS an obvious move, and everyone knows it to be an obvious, see-through move, so why are we playing it when we are pretty confident that our team are a step above in their negotiation skills?
I'm wondering if its some kind of double-bluff, that they know that we know that they know that its an obvious bluff tactic - so we're trying to get inside their heads; could it be a way of trying to get them to back off? or that there REALLY is additional interest and we're just telling the truth; or that the intended audience isn't Chelsea at all but the Caiceido camp; or the Saudis. Or maybe we really don't want Chelsea to quit and we reckon that Boehly et al will be swayed by the oldest tricks in the book...
Now you know how Tony’s poker opponents feelYeah, like you I am pondering this one. The guy in the video is absolutely spot on when he says that it is an obvious move in a transfer negotiation, to either pretend or manufacture interest from elsewhere in an attempt to worry the buyer that they might lose out. And he's right, it IS an obvious move, and everyone knows it to be an obvious, see-through move, so why are we playing it when we are pretty confident that our team are a step above in their negotiation skills?
I'm wondering if its some kind of double-bluff, that they know that we know that they know that its an obvious bluff tactic - so we're trying to get inside their heads; could it be a way of trying to get them to back off? or that there REALLY is additional interest and we're just telling the truth; or that the intended audience isn't Chelsea at all but the Caiceido camp; or the Saudis. Or maybe we really don't want Chelsea to quit and we reckon that Boehly et al will be swayed by the oldest tricks in the book...
Yes, if Nkunku is indeed out for a couple of weeks, that leaves their current registered list of available forwards as:Nkunku has now picked up an injury and they’re unsure how long he will be out so maybe they will need to concentrate their time and money on another striker now as they were already short there.
Four weeks. Four weeks. It already feels like this saga’s been running since Magna bloody Carta.Just 4 weeks of the transfer window left and Chelsea still haven't offered the required fee and got the deal over the line.
Losestanley is having a nightmare. Lol.
I don’t think the buyers have 4 weeks. Previously I think Tony has set a sell by date that precedes the closing of the transfer window. Rightly so, the season begins in 10 days time.Four weeks. Four weeks. It already feels like this saga’s been running since Magna bloody Carta.